• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

What's up with this Ric?

Mind you, it's OK to carve into a Ric if you want to...

N4vo2GY.jpg
 
I'd hazard a guess that the original bridge suffered a catastrophic "tail lift" incident, and ripped up a bunch of wood. Then an amateur spliced in a new block of wood to attach the new bridge.

It's a functional repair, but it ain't pretty.


"catastrophic "tail lift" incident"s can probably be counted on one hand in the history of Rickenbacker, that's pretty much a myth. I've been around the Rickenbacker forums for 20 years and have only seen one actually incident of a tailpiece bending over. I've never heard of a tailpiece ripping up a bunch of wood
 
Given that it has Hi gain pickups and the one piece pickguard, I'd say this is a 4001 from probably 1975 - 1982 or 83 before they switched fully to the 4003. Looks as if it's been kept in not so optimal conditions for a really long time however so there's probably a lot more wrong with it than just the bridge having been hacked up for a replacement. I would be scared to look down the neck to see it's condition.
Honestly a shame, some of them from that era were among the best 4001s they ever produced (before CNC maching that is.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobyoung53
This is for sale on my local CL. Does anyone have any idea what's happening around the bridge?

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

That is an early 80s 4003 with a replacement bridge, when it was done there were no replacement bridges for the 4001 / 4003 basses back then ... I look at that and I see an upgrade.
 
That is an early 80s 4003 with a replacement bridge, when it was done there were no replacement bridges for the 4001 / 4003 basses back then ... I look at that and I see an upgrade.

I don’t often disagree with you, but if that was an early ‘80s 4003, there wouldn’t be a shedua strip, and if it was a split pickguard, there would be three screws there, two below the split and one above (like the one in my avatar).
 
In 1986 I had a badass bridge installed on my '81 4003 rick...It was not a direct fit so the shop had to fill in the spot with wood. That bass got stolen in 1988 and this one is not it...darn it! :) People did these types of mods on rics in the 80's some were done better than others.
 
"catastrophic "tail lift" incident"s can probably be counted on one hand in the history of Rickenbacker, that's pretty much a myth. I've been around the Rickenbacker forums for 20 years and have only seen one actually incident of a tailpiece bending over. I've never heard of a tailpiece ripping up a bunch of wood


Likewise, I've only ever seen it once (in person, but I've seen plenty of photos of the tail lifting, without shearing).

The one I saw had apparently been bending for a while, when it suddenly just ripped - I wouldn't say it took out a bunch of wood, but it did some damage.

I'd guess that the person responsible for the mod in the O.P. probably had more confidence in putting in a new block, and attaching the new bridge to that, than to carve something that fits into the existing cavity (which has clearly been extended), and then attach the new bridge to something with pre-existing drillings, and new wood joins, in all the wrong places... But all we can do is speculate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobyoung53