Perfect-Tommy said:
The place the same exact notes have been played before he was born. You cited his singing and songwriting, which had nothing to do with the question. The things he did that were ground breaking were his rhythm. He didn't use any amazingly new techniques, he didn't introduce the world to melodic basslines. The Police are amazing and Sting is a good bass player. I haven't said anything to imply he's not. The question is "If Sting wasn't the bassplayer, would The Police suck?" And I say, no, they would still rock.
"The place the same exact notes have been played before he was born".
Now that's funny. Obviously you've distilled this down to the name of the note... what he did with those notes is inconsequential. Whether you want to belive it or not, Sting had a very recognizable SOUND. SOUND is not just a note. You even seem to have a clue about that:
"The things he did that were ground breaking were his rhythm".
And without that the Police would've been a very different group.
Where exactly did I cite his singing and songwriting... maybe I didn't realize I wasn't talking about his BASS WORK?
I'm not sure. They might have. Maybe they would have gotten even bigger and done more if they had a bassplayer that didn't get in fist fights with the drummer. Of course, that dynamic is also part of what made them great.
Funny, I didn't hear the fist fights on the recordings
Whatever it might've been sans Sting, it most likely wouldn't have been the same.
Believe it or not, some of the best music made by more than two people has come from people who didn't even like each other at the time... and since you like to cite the original question, was getting along with others a parameter?
The question isn't "who could have filled in and kept a band from sucking?" I'm just saying it's very possible that The Police could have had another bass player and been alright. They're not like Rush or Primus. They weren't built around the bassplayer. I honestly think that RHCP could do alright if Flea wasn't their original bassplayer.
Yeah, they could've been the Stone Temple Pilots.
Just because he was the one famous for doing it, doesn't mean he was the only one or the first.
I said he was first?
You really don't get historical context do you? He was doing what he was doing when he did it. People who came after him had him as an influence... he didn't have Sting as an influence.
Pompous much? Please impart the wisdom of your years on the oh so ignorant youth. Especially those that have spent years research, listening, enjoying and writing music. I mean, if we're going to turn this into a "mine is larger" contest, I'm leaving.
Dense much?
Bye. I didn't mention your age but you definitely fit the sterotypical can't put anything into context type.
Good to know my opinion is wrong. If you don't agree with me, tough. move on. I'm done talking about this. I think that Sting is good, The Police rule and that there is a possibilty that The Police could have been just as good, if not better, without Sting. I mean, we're talking about a world of hypotheticals.
And they could've been much worse or just ordinary... that's how integral parts works.
I've made it clear I don't agree with you... if you don't like that, move on. Seems like sound advice.
Oh yeah, TOP without Rocco. Of course Rocco without Garibaldi could've been an interesting thing.