• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Which bass lines to play?

I would play the regular bassist's lines.

If it's a jam, I can do what I want. This, on the other hand is a steadily working, tight band, and as you've run sound for them enough to know her lines, that's exactly what I'd play. I would NEVER re-invent the wheel subbing for a working band. Those are the 'right' bass lines for this situation.

this will be my approach. Thanks!
 
It seems to me that the only reason that this is even a question is due to the fact that you know the band and what their bass player is playing. If you came off the street as a sub, how would you know any better than to play the lines as they are written unless they gave you specific instructions about what to play? Having said that, you can almost bet that playing the lines "as written" will screw somebody up, probably multiple times throughout the night. It is important to note that they will also probably not believe that playing them as written will be a problem. I have done plenty of subbing over the years and you just never know what you are going to run into.

This was a very long time ago in a band that I was actually in. I had just joined and I had the usual 2 or 3 weeks to get all their material down, I think we practiced as a group about 3 or 4 times before the first show. Anyway, there was one song that I worked pretty hard to learn, it wasn't hard to play, but it was damn near impossible to hear the bass as the track was total mud (I don't remember what it was). So, the first time we ran it as a group, the drummer totally blew the whole song. I was like, I figured that all out for him to screw it up?! Run it though a second time, same thing. The leader finally said to me in private, you need to play it like this (however it was), the drummer isn't used to the bass that way. I did not last but about 3 gigs with that band.
 
Should I just mimic the same simple bass lines, or play the correct bass lines? As a purist, I have trouble playing something that I know is wrong, but on the other hand I’m being paid to play so maybe I should just suck it up and smile??

Play whatever you like. If you know the parts off the original recordings, knock yourself out.

I have done many sub gigs where playing the parts off the recordings doesn't work because the band has altered the songs too much. In one case they were playing the bridge of a song in the wrong key. So use your ears and back off being “correct” if it’s causing any problems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Artman
So I am a fellow bass player with my own band, and I run sound for a very popular (and busy) local power pop band. For a gig coming up in a few weeks, their bass player cannot make it and they want me to sub in on bass.


Since I have been running sound for them for a long time, I have all the arrangements memorized, so no issues there.


Their bass player mostly plays very simplified versions of the bass lines for the songs. In the band’s case it works as she keeps a steady groove going, and the performance really highlights the four-part vocals anyway. Their crowd dances the entire show and I don’t think anyone notices the incorrect bass lines.


My dilemma is this. Should I just mimic the same simple bass lines, or play the correct bass lines? As a purist, I have trouble playing something that I know is wrong, but on the other hand I’m being paid to play so maybe I should just suck it up and smile??


I’m interested in your thoughts and experiences in this regard.


Cheers.
For cover gigs, I ALWAYS play the exact, correct bassline. This has served me VERY well, and usually elicits wide smiles and comments such as "it's so nice to hear the right bass parts!" and "you sound better than the player that's been with us for years!"
 
So I am a fellow bass player with my own band, and I run sound for a very popular (and busy) local power pop band. For a gig coming up in a few weeks, their bass player cannot make it and they want me to sub in on bass.


Since I have been running sound for them for a long time, I have all the arrangements memorized, so no issues there.


Their bass player mostly plays very simplified versions of the bass lines for the songs. In the band’s case it works as she keeps a steady groove going, and the performance really highlights the four-part vocals anyway. Their crowd dances the entire show and I don’t think anyone notices the incorrect bass lines.


My dilemma is this. Should I just mimic the same simple bass lines, or play the correct bass lines? As a purist, I have trouble playing something that I know is wrong, but on the other hand I’m being paid to play so maybe I should just suck it up and smile??


I’m interested in your thoughts and experiences in this regard.


Cheers.

Is she playing the wrong notes or a Grove that fits the band?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Artman
I feel strongly about not rocking the boat when doing sub gigs. I feel as though I'm there to do everything I can in the spirit of being helpful. Anything that takes away from that should be avoided. But then again, what are they gonna do? Fire you? ;)
 
If the bassist is dumbing down the parts because of her musical limitations then I would say they are wrong. This is assuming the arrangements are like the original recording. On many tunes the bass part is an integral part of the song. I saw a video of a band playing Love Shack and the bassist played a simplified bass part. What a travesty! The original bassline is essential, it drives the song.
I see this too, and it drives me nuts. Saw a cover of What I Am by Edie Brickell, and the bass player didn't even try to play the actual, awesome fretless line, he just played root notes the entire song. Ugh....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bass Viking
So I am a fellow bass player with my own band, and I run sound for a very popular (and busy) local power pop band. For a gig coming up in a few weeks, their bass player cannot make it and they want me to sub in on bass.


Since I have been running sound for them for a long time, I have all the arrangements memorized, so no issues there.


Their bass player mostly plays very simplified versions of the bass lines for the songs. In the band’s case it works as she keeps a steady groove going, and the performance really highlights the four-part vocals anyway. Their crowd dances the entire show and I don’t think anyone notices the incorrect bass lines.


My dilemma is this. Should I just mimic the same simple bass lines, or play the correct bass lines? As a purist, I have trouble playing something that I know is wrong, but on the other hand I’m being paid to play so maybe I should just suck it up and smile??


I’m interested in your thoughts and experiences in this regard.


Cheers.
Musicianship is called for here. Lee Sklar is a master at this. He can pretty much play everything but he never plays too much.

I remember a concert I went to back in the 80's. It was an Eric Clapton concert. He had a firecracker of a young guitarist with him, who just had blazing speed...but he'd get lost. He'd lose his anchor and play the wrong parts over the wrong chords...so he'd just try to play faster. Then Clapton with come in with some slow sort of counterpoints to what this guy was doing and slowly take over the lead. And then the lead would become more lyrical and even in the faster parts, he always played just what the song needed and not any more. I presume that's where he got the moniker "Slow Hand". But the point was play what the song needs, when it needs it. He knows when to fill and when lay back. Same thing here.

I toured with a nightclub group in the early 70's that had 4 lead vocalists, myself included. It allowed for a wide assortment of songs and the harmonies were excellent. We worked out harmonies for every song. When the focus of a group is on the vocals and vocal harmonies, you have to be careful not to go stomping all over them with aggressive bass lines. By the same token there should be spaces in the song where you can do more than simple thumps - some tasteful fills. Just pick your places and don't distract from the vocals. And yes, good vocals can cover for simple bass lines, lead lines, etc., but there is usually space in all of that for some better than basic bass lines as long as it serves the song.
 
So I am a fellow bass player with my own band, and I run sound for a very popular (and busy) local power pop band. For a gig coming up in a few weeks, their bass player cannot make it and they want me to sub in on bass.


Since I have been running sound for them for a long time, I have all the arrangements memorized, so no issues there.


Their bass player mostly plays very simplified versions of the bass lines for the songs. In the band’s case it works as she keeps a steady groove going, and the performance really highlights the four-part vocals anyway. Their crowd dances the entire show and I don’t think anyone notices the incorrect bass lines.


My dilemma is this. Should I just mimic the same simple bass lines, or play the correct bass lines? As a purist, I have trouble playing something that I know is wrong, but on the other hand I’m being paid to play so maybe I should just suck it up and smile??


I’m interested in your thoughts and experiences in this regard.


Cheers.

Personally, I geek out on learning tunes the exact way the OG band recorded (or played live). Not every exact detail per se, but the iconic feel and bassline. I can get a sense as to what was arranged and what was spontaneously improvised like the fills - BUT if there are any fills that became an iconic part of the arrangement my tendency is to learn those like the original. Why fix what ain't broke?

Now live playing is a different matter. It depends on the pocket the band creates, especially the drummer and the rhythm guitarist or whatever the rhythm section consists of. If they AREN'T matching the exact fee of the recording, that "correct" bassline won't fit the groove.

My goal is to make sure:
1) I'm in the pocket with the team - people are grooving and dancing
2) If there is deviation from the learning material, it's never MY FAULT; rather, its my decision to play something more appropriate
3) whatever you end up playing makes the rest of the band sound BETTER, and not like you showing off that you're a know-it-all who did their homework and are opposing the groove/pocket/feel/tempo of their playing
 
  • Like
Reactions: Artman
Serve the song rather than the ego as a purist. My feeling is you’ve been called in as a sub, not to audition for a place in the band. So I’d suggest either discussing it with the band first or sticking fairly close to the band’s established arrangements but maybe add some judicious fixes and tasteful touches to make it your own. Just don’t overdo it.

FWIW, I’ll often simplify a bassline for instrumental solos or if there are complex vocal arrangements in order to let the soloist or the vocalists shine better. But that’s me.
 
Last edited:
Wow, thanks everybody for all the feedback and suggestions. After much consideration, I think I will stick close to what they are used to hearing. I’ll be good with that. It will make the best show.

I think that's your best approach. Being show-ready with their arrangements that their audience goes for is what being a professional is all about. It's about them, not us. And even then, given that you're a different person with different gear and a different touch than the usual bassist, even if you play the usual bassist's parts you'll still naturally put your own "stank" on them.

ASIDE: I remember seeing this video where Ryan Martinie (Mudvayne, Soften the Glare) filled in for Korn during several tour dates while their bassist, Fieldy, was on paternity leave. Ryan played the parts note-for-note as Fieldy would have, because he knew the audience was there to experience KoRn and he was a fill-in with the professional duty of giving the KoRn experience to the best of his ability. It wasn't about him showboating (even though he is a more skilled bassist than Fieldy). But if you watch Korn live vids with Fieldy vs. the shows where Ryan Martinie subbed in, there is a difference, because Ryan is naturally a very taut and technical bassist whereas Fieldy is naturally a more relaxed, loosey-goosey player.
 
Last edited:
Sounds like they follow the KISS principle on the instrument parts so singing is the star? Trust issue here too, you dont want to come across as competitive!

Gonna second what @Lobster11 said.
In general people love vocal harmonies.
Gonna third that, great insight. A lot of people dance to lyrics... Not saying it's right, but...

Be you, play like you.
If you are a better bass player, live it.

Yep agree with play like you. Pretty hard to play like someone else. Being solid matters more than being better though?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FullumMusic