(Side note - it appears that many folks are confusing "anarchy" with "chaos" - they're not the same thing. If your neighbour points a gun at your head and tells you what to do, it isn't anarchy any more).
Some would argue that is government.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
(Side note - it appears that many folks are confusing "anarchy" with "chaos" - they're not the same thing. If your neighbour points a gun at your head and tells you what to do, it isn't anarchy any more).
Some would argue that is government.![]()
Yes, the bottom-line definition of government is "whoever holds a monopoly on violence in a region".
"The monopoly on legitimate violence" is the way i remembered it in PolSci 101.
But the government is the definer of legitimacy, so "legitimate" is somewhat redundant.
I don't think so. By this definition all governments are legitimate, and clearly some are not. If i am not wrong the people confer legitimacy to the government by believing in it's RIGHT to rule. If they don't, there's no legitimacy.
This point gets interesting, and can disappear into a pile of circular definitions, US Civil War references, and quotes along the lines of "democracy is two wolves and one sheep deciding what's for dinner".
I'm too much of a pragmatist, and prefer to stick to the "can they make me do something I don't want to do?" test. Legitimacy is somewhat a matter of opinion.
Rereading this thread had to be one of the more frustrating things I've done in the last few days. And the poll.....dear god, the poll. It's just a quick-at-a-glance testament to a lack of understanding.
Mike
And the poll.....dear god, the poll. It's just a quick-at-a-glance testament to a lack of understanding.
Mike
This stuff here sums it up for me.I agree wholeheartedly. "Carrots" should have run away with it.
I posted this on page 2:calm down mike, just because some folks have a dissenting opinion from your own, ya don't have to call them all ignorant.
A similar (perhaps too advanced for some) point was made by hbarcat about combustion.me said:Let's look at another example. Maybe this one is easier for everyone. Hopefully the parallel is obvious and the conclusions can be drawn without the virtual connect the dot game. Food, water and air. Which is the most important to you?