• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Who does the sound tech serve?

Whether it's the club, band, promoter or 4H talent coordinator wouldn't the point still be to serve the audience? So as to bring in and keep bigger audiences? Because that should be the desire of all the above entities.
If it's the club , you'll check the amp's limiter from time to time if it's not always red ;)
If it's the band , you'll ask the local guy to turn down the limiter on the amp and have control on the subs and front fills
If it's the promoter , you'll have to make everyone happy , wich is impossible , so you'll put your hair on fire and run to the exit
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SoonerBill
One perspective is the sound tech is there to do the band's bidding. To translate the band's sound into the room. Doesn't matter if the band makes poor musical choices (e.g. overplaying), whatever they do should be reflected in the room.

Another perspective is the sound tech is there to transform the band's input into the best audio product for the audience. In this role, sound tech is much like a producer. When the band is nailing it, their job is to translate that into the room. If the band makes poor musical choices the tech has the right to make adjustments including pulling something back or selectively muting.

I'm curious what your thoughts & experiences are ...

The band, venue, and audience. Even beyond providing good sound/mix, they are there to handle issues as they arise that could totally halt a performance or even damage the hearing of people in the room.
 
If it's the club , you'll check the amp's limiter from time to time if it's not always red ;)
If it's the band , you'll ask the local guy to turn down the limiter on the amp and have control on the subs and front fills
If it's the promoter , you'll have to make everyone happy , wich is impossible , so you'll put your hair on fire and run to the exit
Good one!!!
 
One perspective is the sound tech is there to do the band's bidding.

Another perspective is the sound tech is there to transform the band's input into the best audio product for the audience.

I'm curious what your thoughts & experiences are ...

Like Pogorny wrote, the sound tech is responsible to whoever is paying them.

If they work for the band, yes, do the band's bidding.

If they work for the venue or promoter, good luck :roflmao:

I worked as a stage manager at a couple of festivals for over two decades and there are sound companies out there who get hired because they deliver great sound every time. One sound company I worked alongside many times did the New Orleans Jazz Festival for a number of years, two White House inaugurations and even a Disney movie premiere held outdoors in LA…but the company is based in Massachusetts!!! You don’t get called for gigs like that if you can’t deliver.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Podgorny
It sounds bananas that someone (bass player in this case) would think the soundman's job is to make them, the individual player, sound good. Their job is to make the band sound good for the crowd (the customer).

I'm amused by the sentiment that it's the soundguy's job to make the band sound good, but also, they shouldn't have a musical opinion. But literally, the intuition of whether something "sounds good" or not IS a musical opinion. Furthermore, it's possible for one person's version of "good" to be another person's "bad".

Which is all a long way of saying "hire people who do work that you like." Also, pay them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Passinwind
It sounds bananas that someone (bass player in this case) would think the soundman's job is to make them, the individual player, sound good. Their job is to make the band sound good for the crowd (the customer).
These are not mutually exclusive. I would suggest that to make a band sound good, each instrument and vocal should be mixed to sound good.
 
… I am so done with guys who just blast the kick drum.
Been in the audience multiple times and even while wearing earplugs I couldn’t take it and had to leave. I don’t know why this is a thing but I hate it.

I’ve had good and bad sound techs. Apart from reputation you never know what you are going to get. Doesn’t matter who is paying them. If you get a good one, you win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikecd1
I'm curious what your thoughts & experiences are ...

who's signing the sound tech's paycheck? The band? The venue? Someone farther up the foodchain in the SR company's hierarchy who is not beholden to either the band nor the venue?

The signature on the paycheck is who the sound tech is "serving" ...anything above and beyond that is the technician's choice, to take a moral high ground and Do The Right Thing

...or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Podgorny
I did lots of club sound in my time. You work for everyone. The venue, audience, performers.

How that balances is dynamic. On a good night, with a good act, these all work together. On other nights compromises are in order.

If a vocalist is bad then so be it. If you bury them you will hear about it. So I didn’t do that. Back them off some? Sure. Verb? Sure.

It’s who the band is. Gate badly ringing drums? Yes. Soften 3k ice pick guitar? Def. Manage the low end so it is full and balanced? Yes please! Maybe I should come out of retirement….
 
I'm amused by the sentiment that it's the soundguy's job to make the band sound good, but also, they shouldn't have a musical opinion. But literally, the intuition of whether something "sounds good" or not IS a musical opinion. Furthermore, it's possible for one person's version of "good" to be another person's "bad".

Which is all a long way of saying "hire people who do work that you like." Also, pay them.
I'm glad I could amuse you. Furthermore, thanks for your opinion.
 
It's a wide gamut and there are a lot of variables at play. A sound tech can be a drooling slob that is only there for the free drinks. He has hearing damage and damages other people's hearing in the process. That's the kind of guy that preceded me at my first audio engineering gig at a club in Kansas City. Then on the other end of the spectrum you have someone like Claudia Engelhart, with over 30 years of experience who has exclusively managed Bill Frisell's front-of-house mixing since the mid-1980s.

I was the live and recording sound engineer at Birdland Jazz Club in NYC for several years in the mid-00s. I did not only serve the club owner, I did not only serve the band, I did not only serve the audience, and I did not only serve myself. It was a confluence of all of those things together. If you're working in a club, you're answering to the owner, sure, and you're work within their limitations, such as dB limits, etc. But in my opinion, a professional engineer is, at the very least, serving the musicians and the audience first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stylee Mousse