I only take personal attacks as personal attacks. You didn't say, "your definition is too narrow" you said I was narrow minded. That falls directly under personal attack, but I still addressed it dispassionately and intellectually (my whole demeanor in all of my statements about the definition of the word "musician").
Nope. Read better, please. I said the opinion was narrow-minded, by which I meant specifically *the product of a narrow approach to thinking about the topic.* To have called the definition narrow would not have been the same, because a narrow definition can be quite correct and can be the product of quite broad thinking about a subject. But I had no wish to cause personal offense, so to avoid misunderstanding, perhaps we can say "excessively and inaccurately narrow."
I'm not affronted either way (this isn't my first rodeo). I have stated my case. Nobody has refuted what I've said. They only say they don't agree with me.
Sigh. The reason no one has "refuted" what you've said is that refutation is generally not applicable to mere opinion. To factual statements, yes; to opinions, no. So the absence of refutation proves absolutely nothing. With opinions, disagreement is basically all we've got.
I love a good disagreement (only through a discussion can we come to a higher understanding). I think language matters (especially the accuracy thereof). I think knowledge matters.
Fine, but are you suggesting that those who disagree with you DON'T think those things matter?
I do find it odd how many people get really emotionally worked up about this conversation though.
Dude, nobody in this thread has been more vehemently attached to his/her opinion than you. I can't speak for anybody else, but I'm not emotional about this at all.
More and more personal attacks will follow (mark my words... always happens) until I'm either kicked off the forums or leave because of the unbridled hostility. Don't worry... it's coming. You won't have to deal with me too much longer. Then all of you can have that discussion of, "Remember when that narrow minded a-hole tried to accurately define musician?"
This is coming off as something of a persecution complex. Really, this "always happens"?
I find it odd that we try to define musician the same way politicians define pornography. It's a whole, "I can't tell you what it is, but I know it when I see it" situation. The difference is how many people get angry when their definition of musician is challenged. I'm trying to simplify this situation.
If your idea of simplifying the situation is to keep yelling over and over that your opinion of who is a musician is the only right one, period, end of sentence, end of paragraph ... then you might consider refining your strategy. It's not simplifying anything, and you just sound like you're more upset than anyone else.
Last edited: