At 120 bpm in a 4/4 count playing 1/4 notes, you are earning 0.17¢/note.
In an average song of three minutes, a whopping 60¢? I don’t know if that’s lucrative.
![]()
I meant my day job... I'm not in a band....
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
At 120 bpm in a 4/4 count playing 1/4 notes, you are earning 0.17¢/note.
In an average song of three minutes, a whopping 60¢? I don’t know if that’s lucrative.
![]()
One pint? I'd need at least 3 pints in me before playing Mustang Sally.Well, at one pint Mustang Sally was a well crafted original songBut i understand your point.
One pint? I'd need at least 3 pints in me before playing Mustang Sally.![]()
The bass player gets paid for the notes that we don't play.At 120 bpm in a 4/4 count playing 1/4 notes, you are earning 0.17¢/note.
In an average song of three minutes, a whopping 60¢? I don’t know if that’s lucrative.
Sorry, I couldn’t help myself after reading another TB’er comment about how he calculates how much he gets paid per note on a gig. Now, it’s like hearing a song you can’t get out of your head. Every time I think about gigging my head starts trying to figure out rate/note.![]()
You are getting paid market rates. That's what your value is, no more, no less. If you are concerned about money join a soul-sucking, pocket-filling cover band.![]()
And there is something inherently wrong with playing music somebody actually wants to hear , and getting paid for it? Wow... of course the covers I’m playing are so old most of the people that enjoyed them back in the day are mostly dead....lol!!!
As for the OP, being honest, while over 50+ years as a professional bassist, I have done more than a few promotional gigs, but there wern’t many. All of the bands that I’ve worked with for more than a month, since the 60’s to today, have have paid decent money. If it looks like money is not forthcoming, I’m out of there.
The problem is that it's hard to tell when someone is joking on the internet. Particularly when there are so many on TB who say things like that and are 100% serious.Nothing funny about being paid the market rate, but I thought the soul-sucking part should be funny, as opposed to insulting the folks who choose to make music that folks will pay musicians to play.
You Sir are killing it.Cool...I've already made $.6029 from Spotify in 3 years, so I am way ahead of the curve!![]()
Nothing wrong with playing standards for the cash. Nothing wrong with being excited to play new music either. Chances are the OP will feel exactly like you do if he gigs for 50+ years. That's pretty much how I feel too. But I remember what it was like when performing was new and exciting and the money was not the most important thing...or even a thing at all. IMHO, if someone has a good day job, they should try to hold on to that feeling for as long as the can, cause when it's gone, it probably gone for good. When that happens, the OP will struggle with it for awhile, but ultimately he will either say, "show me the money," or he will stop gigging.
The problem is that it's hard to tell when someone is joking on the internet. Particularly when there are so many on TB who say things like that and are 100% serious.
It's not the song that's soul sucking, it's the band. You're sick of a song? Go back to the original recording and play it right. Try to play it better than everyone else. What's sucking your soul is standing on stage with 4 other musicians going through the motions, looking and acting like you're all at the checkout line at 7-11.I didn't think it was meant as a joke or to be insulting. I think it is a fairly honest observation that if you regularly play the same songs over and over again, it tends to become a bit of a grind, just like anything thing else that is done repetitively. Over the course of a few decades there are probably plenty of songs that fall into this category if you play in bands that only cover a few styles. A few years back, I took a trip to New Orleans and all the bands on Bourbon Street were playing pretty much the same songs. I quickly tired of hearing Pour Some Sugar on Me...thankfully I didn't have to play it.
I also think its quite oppressive to have other band members coerce charity out of your meager earnings towards touring bands. If you like them, buy their merch with your own money.
If charity is what your band is all about, you should be united on it, and you can do better than throwing $100 at random touring bands. You can fundraise for local causes, etc.
I think your band is shortsighted however, because how many of those touring bands will throw one of you $100 in your hour of need? Can you honestly say you are set for life? Your family is as well?
Again, if its not about the money, that doesn't mean throwing it away. Is there no greater need out there than another random band? How about the child cancer fund? (extreme example but you get the point)
It still is. People are just too lazy to put any effort into it.Well, at one pint Mustang Sally was a well crafted original songBut i understand your point.
No need to be condescending. Nothing you said is hard to understand. I've been on grass roots tours before, and I understand networking well enough to know one does not have to give up one's meager pay to find more gigs or a place to stay.I know this might be hard to understand but original music works best when bands are connected via a local or regional scene or a shared genre or community. Bands give because they actually get more back. $40 isn't much to give when equals a show and a place to stay when you're on tour yourself. Stronger together.
You're right! I can't argue with that.One pint? I'd need at least 3 pints in me before playing Mustang Sally.![]()
It's not the song that's soul sucking, it's the band. You're sick of a song? Go back to the original recording and play it right. Try to play it better than everyone else. What's sucking your soul is standing on stage with 4 other musicians going through the motions, looking and acting like you're all at the checkout line at 7-11.
I guess it depends on how you look at it...playing the same 12 angst ridden songs that all sound the same week after week would suck more soul out of me than playing 40 cover songs, many of them written by some of the best musicians and bands of all time.
But, each to their own...
This situation angers me more than you can imagine. They are saying, We won't pay the touring bands enough, so please give them your portion." It's SOP for blood-sucking promoters. And we freely participate in their sucking of our lifeblood.
Personally, I feel your entire story outlines a very tragic scenario for the entire music scene everywhere. Your wife is kind of right, but it's not you that aren't valuing your music, it's that everyone everywhere doesn't value music. Living in the current day of free - to - 99 cent downloaded music has killed us. The new generation feels music should be free (they seem to think everything should be free). Yet the worst music imaginable (turn on the radio) makes billionaires out of idiots.
I play originals, don't expect any pay at all, but will be damned if I pass along any of my heard-earned pennies to the so-called touring acts. Their manager should have taken better care of them. My band has needs, too, be it studio time or just pizza and beer.
Listen to Porcupine Tree's Sound of Muzak... it expresses my feelings precisely.