• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Who REALLY makes your bass?

This was posted in another thread here but thought it deserved its own. Very informative video that had me thinking and just reinforcing my belief that you are mostly paying for the name on the headstock. Some of you may know this but there are a lot here who don't. Thoughts?


There’s another vid from Mr. McKnight that’s a follow up to this
 
  • Like
Reactions: mbell75
Six of my guitars and basses are Martins, built in a factory in PA by a company that's been 100% owned by the same family since it was founded in 1833. One is a Tacoma, built in their factory in Tacoma before Fender bought and closed it. My Mota was built by a guy named Jose Mota in his basement in Rhode Island. No mysteries here.
 
Very informative video that had me thinking and just reinforcing my belief that you are mostly paying for the name on the headstock.

In a global(ist) economy where stuff is made literally all over the map, it goes way beyond basses/headstocks. Look up the manufacturer of your jeans, sneakers, A/C unit and run that name against the actual country where the goods were produced.

Some people are happy about this and some are not. We all have our decisions to make and are free to vote with our wallet(s). I make every attempt to do so according to my own beliefs, but YMMV.
 
Last edited:
This was posted in another thread here but thought it deserved its own. Very informative video that had me thinking and just reinforcing my belief that you are mostly paying for the name on the headstock. Some of you may know this but there are a lot here who don't. Thoughts?


I watched the whole thing. Here are my thoughts.

1. Is there truly any deception actually going on? "Duncan Designed" isn't a lie, the name makes it pretty clear that they're not the same as actual Seymour Duncan-made pickups. And the only basses I've seen those pickups on are sub-$500, so it's not as if you're really "paying for the name." He mentioned Grover tuners but didn't say whether the outsourced ones are labeled differently (there's a significant lack of detail throughout the video, by the way). I can't think of a bass that uses Grovers off the top of my head, anyway. Happy to be corrected, though.

2. The other stuff he didn't seem to have a problem with, and for good reason. As he said himself, companies like Samick build for others, but it's to their particular specifications. Samick makes some inexpensive instruments under their own name, but that does not mean at ALL that they are on the same quality level as the instruments Samick makes for others. I think he said Gretsch Electromatics are made by Samick, and those models are pretty universally regarded as being great values.

3. Back to the lack of detail--is it really damning when he says that Fender and Gibson use OEM-outsourced parts for "some" instruments? I mean, which ones? If it's something that's purported to be MIA and costs maybe $1500 or more, then yes, that's not cool. OTOH, if it's only on $600 MIM instruments, no big deal especially if the quality is there. Similar thought when it comes to the mention of Conklin and Elrick--those companies have high-dollar models, but is he saying specifically that those models have cheap bridges and tuners on them? No idea.

Bottom line, I don't see how this reinforces your beliefs.
 
I watched the whole thing. Here are my thoughts.

1. Is there truly any deception actually going on? "Duncan Designed" isn't a lie, the name makes it pretty clear that they're not the same as actual Seymour Duncan-made pickups. And the only basses I've seen those pickups on are sub-$500, so it's not as if you're really "paying for the name." He mentioned Grover tuners but didn't say whether the outsourced ones are labeled differently (there's a significant lack of detail throughout the video, by the way). I can't think of a bass that uses Grovers off the top of my head, anyway. Happy to be corrected, though.

Bottom line, I don't see how this reinforces your beliefs.

Well there are many people who see something like “Fender designed” pickups and assume they are actual Fender pickups. We’ve had that very discussion here in a Squier thread. Easy to see how someone not really aware of what these terms mean could be confused. As for his example of Grover, he covers guitars more than basses, so this really isn’t a video for bass players.

Yes, it reinforces my belief that you are paying for the name on the headstock. Squier for instance, is able to charge more money because they can put Fender on their headstock and in the pickup description. Some even say “Fender designed” for the bridges and tuners too. Put the same parts on bass or guitar with a blank headstock and leave out the Fender designed descriptions and that’s probably a $150 instrument. Really similar to the cheap, no name basses using random Chinese parts that go for $70 online. Add all that Fender designed stuff in and all the sudden, it’s a $300-$500 instrument.
 
hi guys :)

I don't care who made it... as long as it was on a Monday, I'm good.

:D

No way! I can' t stand a headache! I am the Friday afternoon type! :wacky:

On Friday, the workers are drunk, on Monday, hungover.

At least that was the joke about Fender in the mid-70s.

Tuesday to Thursday they were stoned! :laugh:

greetings

Wise
 

Latest posts