DiabolusInMusic
Functionless Art is Merely Tolerated Vandalism
Most people, including yourself, have no idea what they're talking about. This suits people who collet Peavey basses just fine, because it's been keeping prices low. But the fact is that Peavey is a much more innovative company than any other major US manufacturer. Unlike Fender, Gibson, and Rickenbacker, Peavey's image isn't stuck in the 1960's. Peavey can and has released models that go well beyond Fender clones and into entirely unique, technologically ground breaking, boutique-level basses.
Far from being "garbage", I will state as fact that most - perhaps ALL - Peavey basses are superior to their comptetion at their price level. The reason a large segment looks down on Peavey is because it was always Peavey's aim to offer the highest possible quality at an affordable price point. As such, ignorant people associated affordability with low quality, and that point of view stuck. People used to look down their nose at Volkswagen for the same reason.
Ridiculous. I expect you don't have much experience with Peavey, period. The US-Millenniums and TL-5's have outstanding B-strings. Throw in the Cirrus line, and that doesn't leave much. What Peavey 5-strings have you played??
I had a Fury VI for at least a year and played it a ton, I have played a BUNCH of their stuff in store for lengthy periods of time. I have lots of experience with the Peavey B, the last one I checked out was embarrassing. I didn't take note of the model but it was under $600. Pretty well every Peavey B I have played has been extremely loose and sloppy to the point I would avoid it. The Cirrus stuff wasn't really stocked so I don't get a chance to play it that much. I would expect it to perform better. I cannot speak for US Peavey's since I haven't seen too much high end Peavey gear like I said. My town has been without a Peavey dealer for years. Not much of a demand I suppose. L&M also shills their own budget stuff (Yorkville and Traynor) so Peavey is a direct competitor.

