• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why aren't Jazz basses wired Volume-Balance-Tone?

Was a blend pot even an option in 1960? Were any manufacturers offering a blend control? If it wasn’t a thing at the time that would explain why Leo didn’t do it.

I’m just glad he went VVT and dropped the concentric knobs.
 
The J has only three main tones: neck pup full and bridge pup off, neck pup off and bridge pup full, and both pups full. All the other micro variations can be heard only by the player. So, VVT or VBT doesn’t matter.
Yeah I've switched most things to switches on my basses, either Selector/Kill/Tone or individual toggles. I usually add a Series/Parallel switch too.
 
This explains why I've never been able to achieve a 'blend' with jazz bass pickups when one is at 100% volume and the opposite is at any volume other than 100% - The tone simply reverts to the loudest pickup, i.e. 100% bridge and (for e.g.) 75% neck is actually all bridge; and 100% neck and (for e.g.) 75% bridge is actually all neck. I've never understood guys who say, for example, "favorite setting is 100% neck and 50% bridge", because for me it's never worked that way. 100% neck and 50% bridge is all neck.

This was my experience, too. Many years ago, I got tired of messing with VVT on my Jazz, so I put in a blend. It seemed to work like a pickup selector switch, although I was able to get a bit of a difference with a very slight roll either way, as ToddB1963 described. I seem to remember knowledgeable posters on TB back then saying that active blend works way better than passive.

I've been using a 3-way toggle with master volume and tone for many years now and much prefer it to passive blend, even though it is somewhat limiting.
 
Honestly, VVT is really the same result as VBT. I have basses with both but I do have a preference for VBT...it's quicker to get the tone I want...and I don't think the hum is quite the same with a blend pot. But you can't hear the hum live anyways
 
I congratulate those that can blend 10% of the bridge or whatever. To me, the blend pot (or dual volumes) sounds like a toggle switch. Dual volumes can sound different by setting both to, say, 70% or whatever. That's effectively changing the value of the pots used in the circuit making it deeper.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SteveCS
I tried VBT cause I thought I’d like the master, but it just didn’t sound the same. Hard to describe, but muddy?

Lately though I’ve been into running my 2 pickup guitars and basses wide open (tone knob to taste) and adjusting volume at the amp.
 
With a balance pot you can't run up your bridge and leave it while you add in some neck. As the neck increases the bridge decreases.

That's not how, at least the balance pot in my bass, works. It has a click in the center where both pickups are at full volume (no load at all from the balance pot) and to either side one of the pickups remains full on while the other decreases. So, if you turn it all the way tothe right you have bridge only and you can gradually turn it to the right to add any ammount of neck you want till you get to the center click where you have both pickups full as with normal jbass vith both volumes dimed. Past that center click to the right, neck pu remains full while the bridge pu is filtered out. Its a stacked cts balance pot.

Both wiring options have their pros and cons but the difference is rather minimal once you get used to it.
 
It’s never bothered me. I run a Jazz with both Vol at 80% and Tone 30-80%. I’ll fiddle at bit for more bridge (burp) or neck (P tone). Like every Fender design, it’s just a fiddle-til-it’s-good, never maxing anything out, everything interactive situation.
The best controls I’ve encountered for a Jazz bass are the Roscoe Beck controls. With these each component operates more independently from the others.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ToddB1963