Kinda hard to argue with
^this^, IMO. Fender's manufacturing policy has always been "crank 'em out like there's no tomorrow", and even if a 3 screw bridge only saves 2 cents per unit? At 5,000 of these basses a month (which is probably a low estimate), that comes out to... $100. Which, over the course of a year, is enough to make any bean counter worth his pocket protector smile... Besides making those guys happy, if you think about it? How many screws do you really need to hold a bridge down, anyway? Danelectros have managed it just fine with essentially
ONE screw, since the late 1950s. Granted, the front 2 screw heads sit in very shallow recesses on the bottom of the bridge - which does provide some resistance to the pull of the strings -, but it's that one screw in the back that does the lion's share of the work. Plus, if you think about it? On a string-thru bridge, the strings themselves are doing a real good job holding that bridge down - all by themselves...