• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

why did Fender make the 3 hole bridge?

the weird thing about this thread is how so many people put their emotions into answers. I never said anything about being unhappy or having a problem with 3 holes vs 5. I just wanted to know why it was done.
The question was answered - string through bridge spacing... simple, direct and informative.. all the other comments say a lot more about the people commenting than my question does.
I’d say that was about par for the course here at TB. :)

Most social platforms require you to sift through a lot of chaff before you arrive at something useful, and a lot of posters will have strong opinions that aren’t necessarily well founded. In fact, I often find that the stronger the opinion, the less well founded it tends to be.

That said, this is far less prevalent on TB than in many other places, though you will run across the occasional exception that proves the rule.

Glad you found the information you were looking for. :)
 
I’d say that was about par for the course here at TB. :)

Most social platforms require you to sift through a lot of chaff before you arrive at something useful, and a lot of posters will have strong opinions that aren’t necessarily well founded. In fact, I often find that the stronger the opinion, the less well founded it tends to be.

That said, this is far less prevalent on TB than in many other places, though you will run across the occasional exception that proves the rule.

Glad you found the information you were looking for. :)
Yes, I learned something that should have been obvious to me lol
 
Fender has a tradition of….”frugality”. And it’s more than a couple of Pennie’s - probably in the neighborhood of half a buck, once you add in a bit of labor. Tell an accountant that, multiply half a buck by a decent number of units, and…. Look, we have a 3 hole bridge.
In a lot of situations it’s what can be afforded in a pre production budget. A dollar more per unit seems silly to base a decision on, until you realize financing for a million units must be in place before production begins, before any return on investment is realized. As for the three hole Fender bridge in question, their intent would likely be indicated by the presence of holes for string through, or lack thereof.
 
3 hole bridge from my 83' usa P.
not hi-mass nor string thru...Just looks like a cheap mf bridge to me.
 

Attachments

  • 20190925_111638.jpg
    20190925_111638.jpg
    684.5 KB · Views: 64
the weird thing about this thread is how so many people put their emotions into answers. I never said anything about being unhappy or having a problem with 3 holes vs 5. I just wanted to know why it was done.
The question was answered - string through bridge spacing... simple, direct and informative.. all the other comments say a lot more about the people commenting than my question does.

Maybe some of the answers you feel were emotive, or perhaps judgmental (?) weren't directed specifically at you, but were more responses to the comments following your OP?

Regardless of the intent of OP's, once threads are started, they tend to take on a life of their own and people respond to posts down the order, often without even reading the original post. Like face to face verbal conversations, conversations on line can run off on tangents. It's just people being people.
 
To me, the bigger question is why string through?
I don't believe there is any additional acoustic coupling and creating a sharper break angle for the string is never good.
The first ever production Precision bass was string through. We can speculate why it did, but ultimately Leo decided that’s how it was going to be. Link Removed

Too bad Leo died before the internet, I imagine if he was alive he’d be present here on TB and we could ask him.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
The first ever precision bass had string through. We can speculate why it did, but ultimately Leo decided that’s how it was going to be. Link Removed

True, but then he stopped for the next 10 years and CBS went at least another 10 years (if not 20) before the change. Sorry for the derail in this post as it really doesn't matter.
 
Being an odd number, the center hole will match.

Not necessarily front to back (as in "how far from the nut will the saddles end up").

With a different type of bridge you will need to measure where the screw holes go or the intonation range may suffer. It doesn't matter if there are 3, 4 or 5 screw holes. There is no guarantee that the bridge will end up in the right position just because some (or even all) of the old screw holes will match. The only exception is of course when the new bridge is sold as a 100% drop in replacement for the old bridge.
 
Last edited:
the weird thing about this thread is how so many people put their emotions into answers. I never said anything about being unhappy or having a problem with 3 holes vs 5. I just wanted to know why it was done.
The question was answered - string through bridge spacing... simple, direct and informative.. all the other comments say a lot more about the people commenting than my question does.
I guess they "screwed" up. :D
 

Latest posts