They're not super common, each one is unique, and they're quality basses. So why do they have poor resale value?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Why get somebody else's dreams when you can buy your own?
They're highly customized and they're cheap.
They're highly customized and they're cheap. Why get somebody else's dreams when you can buy your own? On top of that, the brand has little to no name recognition. Very few "name" players use Carvin. To go even further, as somebody who owns two Carvins I do not think they are god's gift to basses like some people do. Carvin makes a solid bass but some mediocre electronics which is a huge turn off for a lot of people. I am not that shocked that Carvin's re-sale value is so low. I am surprised by Ernie Ball Music Man and Warwick's low re-sale values though.
I know Carvin has had a bad rap for resale value but if you look closely at the bass classifieds here on TB, nothing is selling unless you mark them way below normal value. It's just a bad time to sale gear.
They're not super common, each one is unique, and they're quality basses. So why do they have poor resale value?
To me it was about that catalog mail order in your face (I used to get their catalog for years and never asked for it) and trying to be fancy. Fancy is tough to sell. And that they overextended themselves into products like amps, PAs, all kinds of stuff that were marketed to be packed with value. Takes the sexiness out of it. Kind of like a Sears or JC Penny brand.
Oh and those pointy headstocks... yuk.