TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

I've used others woods such as teak, ebony, ipe and laminates as well as solid maple. I have a preference for one piece blanks for neck through as opposed to laminates even though I have built the latter.I think most neck-through designs are Maple all the way through, but the wings will be a different wood.
So what is it about a neck-through and/or a set-neck that would cause a non-linear stiffness?
The resonant frequency of any material depends on density and stiffness. Frequencies at or near the resonant frequency would be enhanced and not suppressed. So pretty much like a parametric eq the center peak of the assembly can be shifted up or down depending on density and stiffness of material. How much of the effect can be heard or quantified is up to experiment or trial and error. The value of this is also debatable. Because science.I think you were the one who mentioned dead-spots are the result of a resonant frequency in the neck.
So couldn't there be a subdued sound if the whole neck resonates differently from a screw-on neck?
I suppose "compressed" was the wrong word choice, but it seemed a good explanation someone else used to describe the subdued sound that happens with a neck-through vs. a screw-on.
Acoustic string instruments have been built with set necks for centuries (there are exceptions, of course). When Gibson started building solid body guitars, they built them the way they built their acoustics. Fender's first guitars were solid body electrics so they didn't have traditional shop practices driving their construction methods. The Precision Bass was the first electric bass guitar to gain widespread popularity so its design and construction was what influenced other companies.Considering a set neck on an original bass build with a thin body. Wanted to switch it up from my other neck thru builds, but couldn't find neck bolts short enough for my needs. My question is why are set necks so uncommon in basses compared to guitars, whereas bolt-on basses are all over the place?
Frequencies at or near the resonant frequency would be enhanced and not suppressed.
Yes the resonant frequency is the frequency that an object resonates with an applied frequency (the reason why some buildings collapse during an earthquake and others do not). So the resonant frequency of a complete bass assembly dictates where the assembly would resonate sympathetically and dictate what range of frequencies would be enhanced. Not a point to be argued as this is basic physics and proven again and again with science. Now to throw another wrench into the mix is the refraction of sound waves when passing from one media to another (assuming different densities). Here is where you would expect a dampening of select frequencies as there would be losses at the point of refraction (where one material meets another). Everything has an effect just some minute and some infinitesimal. Whether the human ear can discern such effects can be debated but not with subjective listening surveys. That makes one ponder the effect of laminating materials and the choice when laminating. In conclusion I therefore try to minimize the different woods used (see picture for an example). But I am not opposed to laminations or different construction methods and have assembled bolt-on set neck and neck through instruments with great results. Blindly slapping material together because you think a sound will result is at best a crap shoot.That's exactly what I thought, but over in the Graphite vs. Ti thread it was suggested it's the opposite.
So now I'm confused as to which is true.
Apparently the idea is that if the neck is resonating (vibrating) at the same frequency as the note being played, then there's a dead-spot.
As I understand it, if the whole instrument has a resonance at a given frequency, two things happen: It damps the string vibration because it's vibrating at the same frequency as the string, and the pickup's output is muted because the body is also making that vibrate at the same frequency.That's exactly what I thought, but over in the Graphite vs. Ti thread it was suggested it's the opposite.
So now I'm confused as to which is true.
Apparently the idea is that if the neck is resonating (vibrating) at the same frequency as the note being played, then there's a dead-spot.
i tend to favor neck through designs for electric instruments, ime they seem to be the most stable in terms of sustaining a specific set-up for longer periods. but, when things go wrong you have less options for a fix.
This neck through built in 1987 has one piece maple neck and has remained absolutely stable. Laminations are not necessarily required for that, just careful selection of wood and proper curing and prep. By the way the neck is very thin on this one.I suspect that it has less to do with neck-thru versus the others, and more to do with the fact that most neck-thrus are multi-lam instead of one piece.
This neck through built in 1987 has one piece maple neck and has remained absolutely stable. Laminations are not necessarily required for that, just careful selection of wood and proper curing and prep. By the way the neck is very thin on this one.
View attachment 3737791
It does not convert the mechanical vibration of the body. It converts the vibration of the steel string through its magnetic field.
Exactly. If the string were stationary and body vibrating, the string would, in fact, be moving relative to the pickup. And, thus, the pickup will produce a signal.Right, but if the pickup is static relative to the body, it affected by the body's resonance.
Further exceptions. There are more.Such a nice looking bass! And an exception to the general rule, I submit.