• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass Why learn both bows?

+ 1 for teaching too. Also, if you think you will be a teacher some day then learn to play piano as second instrument so that you can accompany your students. That is my main regret after many years of teaching bass - I preferred sport to piano lessons when I had the chance!!

Cheers......

DP
 
+1 for teaching; you don't want to immediately alienate 50% of potential students, do you?

Also, yes. Each grip will, over time, teach you very valuable things about the other bow.

[/url]

This sums it up. I studied both bows and use both grips. It can also be nice when you get a one off with a great player, you can just bring the bow they play. I favor the German but when I took lessons with Joëlle Léandre I brought the French bow, for example.
 
As a very new bassist (less than a year), I don't have a favorite yet. I've been learning easy film scores and such on my own with both bows. I think its good to just have an idea of how to play with either bow. I like the power and projection from the German bow but I like the control I have with the French. And yes I'm gripping them correctly, I checked.
 
Also, learning both will keep you from being sucked into stupid opinions about the "other kind of bow."

Having gone to university in Toronto, there was, and sometimes still is, a definite hate-on against German bows there (it depends on the age of the person you're talking to). It was a carry over from the opinions in Philadelphia where my teacher went to school.

I got a bachelors and a "private masters" on French. I now play German as I find it is more comfortable for my thumb. But I don't find they feel or sound any different.
 
I'm going to post a slightly dissenting opinion.

I started playing one bow (we'll call it 'A'), then switched to the other ('B') in high school, to match my teacher. In college, my teacher played 'A', and I eventually switched. I now am a fairly dedicated 'A' bow player.

Looking back, I learned virtually nothing during the time I played the 'B' bow that I couldn't have learned had I continued to play the 'A' bow (apart from the techniques needed to play the 'B' bow itself).

I did, however, expend a considerable amount of energy learning the 'B' bowing technique (remember how hard it is to get your bow grip and strokes right?). When I switched back, I expended another, similar amount of energy re-learning the 'A' bow (I had not been an accomplished 'A' bow player when I began learning 'B').

That energy would probably have been more profitably directed into other aspects of my playing, or a greater mastery of 'A' bow from the beginning.

The only exception I see to this was that I did benefit from playing the same bow as my teacher, but since I was not a music student (for long), I did not choose a university based on the bow played by the instructor there.
 
I'm going to post a slightly dissenting opinion.

I started playing one bow (we'll call it 'A'), then switched to the other ('B') in high school, to match my teacher. In college, my teacher played 'A', and I eventually switched. I now am a fairly dedicated 'A' bow player.

Looking back, I learned virtually nothing during the time I played the 'B' bow that I couldn't have learned had I continued to play the 'A' bow (apart from the techniques needed to play the 'B' bow itself).

I did, however, expend a considerable amount of energy learning the 'B' bowing technique (remember how hard it is to get your bow grip and strokes right?). When I switched back, I expended another, similar amount of energy re-learning the 'A' bow (I had not been an accomplished 'A' bow player when I began learning 'B').

That energy would probably have been more profitably directed into other aspects of my playing, or a greater mastery of 'A' bow from the beginning.

The only exception I see to this was that I did benefit from playing the same bow as my teacher, but since I was not a music student (for long), I did not choose a university based on the bow played by the instructor there.

I see where you are coming from, but at the same time, I have played a different grip from my teacher and learned just as well. All of the concepts of sound production are essentially the same.

Also, I think that if a student has huge problems with one type of grip, it might just be easier to start them on the other bow with proper technique than take the time and strain to fix the original technique. I think this is a good priority for teachers.
 
I see where you are coming from, but at the same time, I have played a different grip from my teacher and learned just as well. All of the concepts of sound production are essentially the same.

Also, I think that if a student has huge problems with one type of grip, it might just be easier to start them on the other bow with proper technique than take the time and strain to fix the original technique. I think this is a good priority for teachers.

I agree that one can learn many things without playing the same bow grip as one's teacher, but I've learned over years of playing that fine details in one's bow grip can have big influences one one's technique. Working out problems like that can be hard, if your mentor doesn't use the same grip.

I definitely, definitely agree that one should try both bows before settling on one, given the chance! But that's different from devoting time and energy to mastering both before choosing.

The main point I'm making is that I think I'd probably be a stronger bassist if I had not spent time switching back and forth and instead focused on fixing the problems I had with the bow grip I had.

To help clarify my perspective, I'm a purely classical player and I spend the vast majority of my playing time using the bow.
 
There is certainly value in learning both, but there is a practical element to consider. Bows are expensive, and finding the right bow for you is a challenge even aside from cost issues. If you have say $1500 available, you'd do much better to put it all into one bow you really like than to buy two marginal $750 bows. As a student I badly underestimated the importance of having top quality gear. When I finally did go out and drop $2k on a really good bow, I think using it for three months did more for my playing than some whole years of lessons.
 
I was playing on a german since i started out. Just last year, I studied bass under David Potts for a couple of sessions. When I got back in Manila, i started getting really comfortable with the French. Getting to know the pros and cons of both bows helped me choose which one to use on specific pieces. plus i have 2 students, one on german bow and one on french bow :D really helps in teaching when you know both :)

*side note*
Thanks David for the lessons and the experience you shared with me in my stay in Sydney :D hope to visit you again soon :D

JC Magsalin
Manila, Philippines :D
 
Is it hard to learn the other once you've started? I can't imagine really playing proficiently utilizing German bow. Can't even figure out the bow-hold, but maybe it's just cos I'm a snugglemuffin...

They're different enough that knowing one won't confuse you with the other, so the answer to your question is basically, "How hard was it to learn German bow?" It will be the same difficulty (roughly) to learn French bow. A few basic bowing principles translate, but the bow hold, which is very important to getting the right sound and articulation, is totally different.

The point I'm trying to make is that to learn either bow - I mean really, really learn it, so you've got great technique on either one, takes a lot of effort. I'm not against fooling around with both, as I've obviously switched back and forth and occasionally pick up the other bow for a minute or two here and there.

Perhaps the confusion is in the degree of commitment that people imply when they say "learn both bows". For me, to learn a bow is a big commitment, that might fall short of mastery, but it takes months of practice, at least.

Other people may be happy simply being shown the grip and playing for an hour or so, and in that case, I encourage people to play around with both.
 
+1 for teaching; you don't want to immediately alienate 50% of potential students, do you?

Also, yes. Each grip will, over time, teach you very valuable things about the other bow.

A wonderful discussion related to this:
Invalid Link Removed
I don't think that being a skilled individual at any specific type of bow would effect you. There are successful players on both bows obviously, but, I believed that is a direct result of skilled players passing on their experienced knowledge. Learn the other bow type for fun, but when it comes down to getting a gig it would be wise to focus on one type,until one has a little more financial stability.
 
I don't think we should worry so much about identifying ourselves in one category or the other. Rather, listen to which bow suits us best at specific points in our lives. This can and will change as our bodies, minds, and pool-of-experience develop and grow.

I started with the French-bow as I'd been a cellist before I started bass. When I got to conservatory I had difficulty getting rid of the tension in my body which stemmed from my tense use of the French-bow, after a few months of struggle, I tried holding the bow underhand, and all of that tension immediately disappeared. My decision was made for me, I found I could get twice the sound with a tenth the effort.

After ten years of playing German bow, I have spent the last two months playing only French-bow. I was having a problem with the rhomboid muscle in my back, probably from extra reaching with the German bow for many hours of practicing and working, plus I have mild scoliosis. After a month of intense pain, spasms, etc, I came across my old French-bow and decided to give it a try. Not only was the rhomboid muscle relieved of its' stress, but playing with the French-bow felt natural and easy.

Having played French-bow again for 6-8 hours a day for 2 months, still no tension problems that plagued my teen years. I am getting more power and tone than I ever did with the German bow. Things I couldn't do with the French-bow 10 years ago, regardless of how hard I tried, I can now do with no effort. I think this is because of the experience of playing with great French-bow players, plus hearing, watching, and playing with some of the best violinists, violists, and cellists alive today. There is a certain amount of learning by osmosis of just being around great players. Also, when something is new you generally focus better and experiment more.

If you're struggling with a passage with the French-bow, it might be worth it to try working on it with German-bow, and vice-versa. Although you may not be aware of exactly what the problem is, switching will eliminate the problem you had with the first bow, showing you, even if subconsciously, how to get rid of it when you do go back.
 
I should also mention that playing piano will help develop your right hand dexterity. If you're a French-bow player and can't control the German-bow to save your life, playing piano helps so much to develop your right hand dexterity. Likewise, if you're a German-bow player and feel like you can't get power with the French-bow, doing athletics/yoga/pilates/etc will help you develop the way you use your body and transfer weight into the string. This is what I mean by how we develop mentally and physically will change what bow will work best for us at a given time.
 
I am a frenchie but I would like to try a German bow just to know how it feels. Will holding my french bow with a German grip give me a good impression of the feel and capabilities of a German bow? Not that I ever want to play like this but to buy a German bow just to try it out is a waste of money. And I don't have one to borrow either.