TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Start a thread with a controversial statement + Make no further remarks on your own thread = TROLL.
Why can't people just appreciate what the bassist brings to the band and not what he doesn't? Pink Floyd, ACDC, U2..........What do they have in commom besides "solid" bass players? They were geat bands that a lot of people liked. Put, Geddy, Wooten, Claypool in those bands and they don't work. I can appreciate and respect both ends on the bass playing spectrum. (I'm closer to the Waters end of that spectrum myself) But I like bassist who fit the band.

For an example of Roger playing a well-known song a bit busier than the album version, I love this clip of Any Colour You Like from 1975. This is about as busy as anyone should dare play this absolutely epic bassline, and even then only if your name is Roger Waters. Invalid Link Removed
All this crap about how David played all the basslines. Whatever. Roger played bass on the first album before David even joined the band. And, BTW, Roger's playing was busier in the early days. He actually got steadier and more disciplined as they approached the zenith of the band's history in the 70s. I gather that to Roger, a bass is just a tool to help make the whole band sound the way the song calls for, not something to personally rock out on. Very different philosophy than, say, John Entwistle.
On the web you can find some lists of Great Bassists Ever... And more than once I found Roger Waters. He was nice musician, but I will not say that he's good as Geddy Lee, Squire, McCartney or PASTORIOUS.
His bass lines are very simple !
Too flashy for FloydGuy Prat is awesome in delicate sound of thunder and Pulse IMO