• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why the bigger rigs....?

I practiced last night at a venue that had the biggest PA I've ever played through, a sound guy that loves low end, and we didn't have an audience whose sensibilities we had to deal with. I brought no rig, and....after an hour of bone shaking, I was smiling from ear to ear. I guess I'm anti big rig a this point, unless the rig is the PA, in which case I'm definitely pro big rig.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FlatwoundFunk
So what gives? How come we're looking for big bass rigs instead of using the PA and the available monitor systems? I mean, I'd much rather have less to move and put all that load on the sound guy.
We use a vocals only PA so my rig carries the house, which sometimes is outside!

I would love to roll up to a gig with my bass and DI box and plug into a huge PA (with exceptionally good monitoring) but it ain't going to happen.
 
Ok, this might be a thread that will get me flamed, but lately I've been having this question more and more.

I see a lot of threads saying things like "I need a bigger rig because I'm playing bigger rooms or outdoor events...". And I'm not getting it. In bigger rooms or outdoor events there should be sound reinforcement that includes subwoofers and enough power to make the entire band fill the room, i.e. a bigger rig shouldn't be necessary. Am I missing something? I just played a venue that holds 25,000 people--it was for a half marathon and nowhere near full--but we had a prosound company providing sound reinforcement and I could have played it with my little 2x10 cab. As it was I put a 2x12 underneath the 2x10, but it was purely for visual effect--the amp's volume was close to zero.

So what gives? How come we're looking for big bass rigs instead of using the PA and the available monitor systems? I mean, I'd much rather have less to move and put all that load on the sound guy.

Ok, ready, go!
Bolded the key phrase there.

"Should be" doesn't translate to "is."

Maybe try doing a search on topics that have come up a million times.

Also bass through monitors usually sounds like crap to me.

And some bands are really really loud as a deliberate goal. You don't know everyone's gigging situation, so maybe don't be bothered that other people do things differently than you do in their bands.
 
My main rig is an Ashdown CTM300 paired up with a Greenboy Dually. Hardly what I would call egregious. Now if I decided to add an additional Dually; that would probably be too much.
Or just enough!

Your not missing something.

There is a certain point where it is all about the whole status symbol thing.
Says a guy whose screen name is "Big Hoss.
 
I've played many a pro stage with countless national acts over the years. Needless to say I've played behind many state of the art concert level PA systems.

I can't imagine playing with just a 212 cab unless it was being miced.

These days with the killer in ear monitoring I don't actually even need a stage amp as I can get everything I need via them. I'm not playing pro these days but I always had at least a 410 and head on stage just in case something happened to the ears.

If I didn't have ears, and was stuck using side fills or wedges, having a bass system I could hear was paramount. Big stages with big foh systems are loud. As a bassist, there is a bass drone that makes hearing the actual bass on stage hard at times and it's Hard to articulate with the stage and crowd noise going.

It's also a lot easier to get a sweet spot to where you can hear yourself better with a bigger pocket of sound by adding more speakers instead of volume. It's hard to explain but a wall of speakers can actually be quieter than a few speakers trying to cover the same area.

Outdoor shows not in a club also don't have all the walls to bounce the sound off and often need a little more speaker volume than sound volume.

So that's my reasoning from being there and actually needing bigger or rigs with more coverage than a single 10 or 12 could ever offer
 
Last edited:
My view is to always go smaller on stage as much as you can. Let the PA handle it and save your ears.

If you need to play in large venues without PA support, then insist on properly charging so you can hire a sound company. Don't damage your hearing with big iron behind you that suppose to fill the venue. That's simple suicide for your ears.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FlatwoundFunk
How come we're looking for big bass rigs instead of using the PA and the available monitor systems?
Because nearly every available monitor system I've come across either stinks at bass amplification or has someone not well versed at doing so running it. I prefer to have behind me that which I can control and hear what I want.
 
Ok, this might be a thread that will get me flamed, but lately I've been having this question more and more.

I see a lot of threads saying things like "I need a bigger rig because I'm playing bigger rooms or outdoor events...". And I'm not getting it. In bigger rooms or outdoor events there should be sound reinforcement that includes subwoofers and enough power to make the entire band fill the room, i.e. a bigger rig shouldn't be necessary. Am I missing something? I just played a venue that holds 25,000 people--it was for a half marathon and nowhere near full--but we had a prosound company providing sound reinforcement and I could have played it with my little 2x10 cab. As it was I put a 2x12 underneath the 2x10, but it was purely for visual effect--the amp's volume was close to zero.

So what gives? How come we're looking for big bass rigs instead of using the PA and the available monitor systems? I mean, I'd much rather have less to move and put all that load on the sound guy.

Ok, ready, go!
Because too many bassists buy the BS "We don't run BASS through the PA, only every single drum mic, vocals, guitar (which are already too loud), the conga guy who randomly shows up, 5 vocal mics."
 
I just mentioned this in another thread, but the bigger rig really isn't necessary. I've got a GK MB212II and just last Saturday it did just fine against a Marshall full stack in a room where the only thing in the PA was the kick and vocals.

It's a hardcore band that is extremely loud.

The week before we shared a bill with some sludge /stoner bands and man did they bring out the big guns. Huge fridges and stacks with big tube amps (Sunn, Marshall, Orange and SVT's) and while we were throwing our crap on stage one of the guys from the other bands was confused as to why I was using that little combo while the guitarist has the big full stack. Once we were finished he came up to me and made the comment about how loud that thing could get. I said yep! "That's why I brought it" I said while I was walking out the back door with everything in my hands. That particular show was a bigger room with full PA support.
couldn't agree more about the mb212. mine is a beast. I actually just swapped it out at our venue to my 2x10 avatar cab (elevated and vertical) because I wasn't utilizing the 212 at all really. it's size and weight is better suited as my travel amp, leaving my 2x10 and head stationary. it's just my travel amp is more powerful...lol. love that modern tech.

i cannot fathom a concert I would ever play in where a DI and/or the mb212 wouldn't fill in beautifully.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FlatwoundFunk
My view is to always go smaller on stage as much as you can. Let the PA handle it and save your ears.

If you need to play in large venues without PA support, then insist on properly charging so you can hire a sound company. Don't damage your hearing with big iron behind you that suppose to fill the venue. That's simple suicide for your ears.
Ear plugs have existed for decades.
 
I played a school gym once where we (4 piece) were well spread out from each other. I had my 300w EA Micro and Wizzy10, it was barely enough for me and the drummer to hear it on stage (placed equidistant between us so we could both hear it, barely) — even though the company that hired us had a great big PA for the kidz to hear us, said Co had zip for monitoring. I think that's when I blew my Wizzy10's speaker. :mad:


You need the right tools for the job, and I (and the Co that hired us) did not have those tools.
Hah! Back in the day... (here we go) when no one's hearing was shot, I had a 40 watt rig and a single 15 that I carried to the school gym, walking, in the snow, uphill, both ways. We didn't have no stinking house PA. :woot:
 

Latest posts