TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I can't with for a "historically accurate" three point bridge, so we can all endure exactly the same frustration as the kids who played Gibson basses in the 60's.
3 pointer started mid 73. But the evertilt and bar bridges of the 60s were worse.![]()
true, just like Gibson as a whole doesn't care about Gibson basses lolThe market, as a whole, doesn't really care about Gibson basses
I frankly can't understand how being an expert in the "relicing" techniques can make someone able to recreate historically accurate instruments ... when those instruments were sold, they were new, not "reliced" ... a Custom Shop, having the recreation of accurate reproduction of, now, vintage instruments as its scope of work, should focus on the tone and materials rather than on the look of the instruments it manufactures, in my opinion.
basic QC should be top priority, nothing shoddy should ever escape any factory.I frankly can't understand how being an expert in the "relicing" techniques can make someone able to recreate historically accurate instruments ... when those instruments were sold, they were new, not "reliced" ... a Custom Shop, having the recreation of accurate reproduction of, now, vintage instruments as its scope of work, should focus on the tone and materials rather than on the look of the instruments it manufactures, in my opinion.
what is that creature called?They can keep the retro basses on the back burner - just remake some of these monsters for us
View attachment 3627867
CMI "SG" Amp (Chicago Musical Instruments owned Gibson for a couple decades...)what is that creature called?