• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Will This Work?

As long as the scale is right. 34" from bridge to nut.
You won't be "Slapping" anything on.. The neck pocket will have to be routed out to accept the bigger/wider bass neck - same with the bridge if it's set-in. If it's a surface mount, then ya. The Pup cavities are probably too small for the bass pups, again routing will be required.
Use painters tape on the body BEFORE you do any routing to keep it from getting scratched up.
Measure twice cut once.
 
As long as the scale is right. 34" from bridge to nut.
You won't be "Slapping" anything on.. The neck pocket will have to be routed out to accept the bigger/wider bass neck - same with the bridge if it's set-in. If it's a surface mount, then ya. The Pup cavities are probably too small for the bass pups, again routing will be required.
Use painters tape on the body BEFORE you do any routing to keep it from getting scratched up.
Measure twice cut once.

Yup

I doubt this would work, given the length of a strat body.

remember, the distance from the 12th fret must be the same, form the fret to the nut and the fret to the bridge. 17" for a 34" scale neck.
 
You might be able to... but why? Just to have a somewhat comically strange looking bass? You'd have to do quite a bit of routing, and of replacing pickups, all for a really weird looking bass that will probably also neck-dive.

Not saying you shouldn't try, but I'm just curious as to what you're after here.
 
I'm looking at one of Warmoth's double necks. Double strat. I'm thinking 12 on top, bass VI on bottom. Of course, this is in the distant future, I have no need for one now, and I'm saving up for a Ric right now anyway, but I just wanted to know if it'd work.