• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Winter Build Off 2022 - Explorer Bass

Slidlow said:
If you go with standard Fender 5/8" depth pocket you will have 1 1/8" left over. You could also build in a little angle on the bottom of the neck pocket/protrusion to correctly align your neck with the bridge depending on its height.
Aha! Now it's 1-1/8"x2-1/2".

The Protrusion Thickens... (bad pun)

I'd rather have the neck dead straight. Or is there a reason for putting it at an angle?
 
Last edited:
Aha! Now it's 1-1/8"x2-1/2".

The Protrusion Thickens... (bad joke)

I'd rather have the neck dead straight. Or is there a reason for putting it at an angle?

Neck angle and deck height - the height of the fretboard above the body - are determined by the height and adjustment range of the bridge saddles. You need the neck to set at and angle and height that allow for proper action based on how tall the bridge is. Angle and deck height are interactive, if you need X height at the bridge, you can get there with angle and/or height. Conventionally, Fender basses are built with a 3/8" height and zero angle. That works fine for Fender style bridges. Some other brands use a smaller height and a slight angle to get to the same Fender bridge requirement. Some other brands use a taller bridge and even more angle to work things out.

It's really up to you to decide how to proceed. The simplest thing is to copy whatever bass your bridge would normally go on. Or if you don't want to do that or don't know, deteremine the min and max height adjustment for the bridge, and draw it all out on paper as a side view of the body. Make a line for the top surface of the body. Mark the bridge position and the saddle adjustment range. Then you can draw in different deck heights and neck angles to see if a line projected out from your fretboard puts you in range of the bridge or not.

When it comes to neck angles, a very little angle goes a very long way. Half a degree at the neck pocket can translate to nearly 1/8" difference at the bridge.
 
This bass will be neckdivey no matter what. It comes with the shape.
Where are you putting the strap pins? When I had the Epi Korina Explorer it was a bit of a submarine but I reckon if I'd moved the pins to alternative locations I could have made it better. I didn't because it was absolutely perfect and I knew I didn't love it enough to keep it and drill holes. As yours is custom, that may not matter a damn.

My two location suggestions based upon 15yo memories post head trauma, were that when I tried with duct tape I came up with these. First was in the neck plate area (I know it was set neck) and on the back top of the body in a direct vertical line from the rear of the bridge. A flushmount straplock would work well here, and a conventional on the other end. This angled it up about 45* which is my preferred and the bridge end straplock I didn't think would have bothered me, but I'm used to a Steinberger pivotplate/Boomerang. Takes some duct tape and time to try.

I've wondered about doing a V bass later and they'd need to be in about the same places, or so my marsupial brain says.
 
  • Like
Reactions: instrumentalist
If it were me, I'd snap a line between the points on the neck end of the body and put the end fret there. Almost between the two pictures.
I'm not sure what points you mean. Do you mean the points where the curved edge gives way to a straight edge?

Anyway I will reshape that part of the body, to a more conventional Explorer shape. Not because it's conventional, but because I feel it'll improve the overall shape.

Sort of like this:
IMG_20211230_115354.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beej
I'm not sure what points you mean. Do you mean the points where the curved edge gives way to a straight edge?

Anyway I will reshape that part of the body, to a more conventional Explorer shape. Not because it's conventional, but because I feel it'll improve the overall shape.

Sort of like this:
View attachment 4521876

Excuse the crappy phone sketch, but a straight edge along that blue line should get you close.
Typically you should just reach over the edge of the body to get to those top frets.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20211228_201736.jpg
    IMG_20211228_201736.jpg
    107.7 KB · Views: 91
Excuse the crappy phone sketch, but a straight edge along that blue line should get you close.
Typically you should just reach over the edge of the body to get to those top frets.
Aha! So the point here is keeping the top frets within reach. Now I see where you're coming from.
I'll keep it in mind, but let me say that I'm not hugely concerned about those top frets. I rarely use them. (I'm fond of saying that a bass needs four frets, because the next note can be played on the next string.) :D

By the way, doesn't Nebraska have Mountain Time? By my reckoning it was 4:12 AM there, when you posted that.
 

Latest posts