• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Wishnevsky!!!!!!

Jeez. How much extra effort could it take to make a useable instrument? Why go though all the trouble of building when it so obviously lacks in function? At least make the effort to install a working bridge for goodness sake. I have no problem with 'art', but if you call it a 'bass' it should at least be playable. I wonder how he calculated where to put the side dots with that bridge...
 
from what I understand, the bridge isn't glued down, so maybe you're supposed to futz w/ it yerself? Wasn't there one where it overlapped the control plate a bit? Maybe so you could get a nice sitary buzz/drone?

Looks like maybe he was 'going' for symmetry w/ the p'up and fingerboard end, but didn't quite get there.

The guy doesn't back down from a close-up shot, he's got guts! or something...
 
Originally posted by john turner
does anyone else get the feeling that there are velvet elvises and really deep shag carpet in mr. wishnevsky's woodshop? and you know, those bobbing flamingos that used to be considered groovy in the 70's?

Yeah, but what worries me is the fact that, like said velvet Elvi, flamingos and other "vintage" sundry items, Wishnevskys will one day reap huge returns thanks to their intrinsic "cheese" factor! :eek:
 
Originally posted by Planet Boulder


Yeah, but what worries me is the fact that, like said velvet Elvi, flamingos and other "vintage" sundry items, Wishnevskys will one day reap huge returns thanks to their intrinsic "cheese" factor! :eek:

well, take heart. remember, there are some cheesy things that don't increase in value or appeal as they get older.

cheese, for one.