• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Wooden Frets

After thinking about this for a couple hours.... I think ehque might be right:

"Your bass contacts the vibrating string at 2 points. the fret, and the bridge."

Wooden bridge saddles, metal frets. Doesn't that physically accomplish the same thing as wooden frets and metal bridge saddles?
 
After thinking about this for a couple hours.... I think ehque might be right:

"Your bass contacts the vibrating string at 2 points. the fret, and the bridge."

Wooden bridge saddles, metal frets. Doesn't that physically accomplish the same thing as wooden frets and metal bridge saddles?

Wow, now there's a stoner puzzle. (not calling you or anyone else a stoner, now quit it).

My gut says that the string sees more damping at the fretted than the bridge end, even though the finger is beyond the "vibrating length". Some damping of overtones, maybe not musical ones at all? So maybe it would be different. But I'm sure I couldn't tell the difference!!! So then it would be the same? Right?
 
OK, I'm going to quit beating around the bush. It's a dumb idea. Why do you suppose, in over 50 years of electric bass lutherie, it hasn't popped up anywhere? (Answer: Because it's a dumb idea.) OK, flame away.

Well, it has happened elsewhere, hasn't it? With success, I might add.

Now I'm not saying it's a good idea. I'm not saying it's a bad idea. I don't think it's commercially viable. I do think it's an interesting discussion.

But what I don't get is why people get so damn DEFENSE while they're shooting down this idea. Why does it bother people so much that someone had an idea that they think is bad? Why do people feel the need to insult and ridicule him?? Let's try and have a civilized discussion here, people. If you think it's a terrible idea, ok, say so and give us some intelligent reasons why. And if you think it's a good idea, give us some intelligent reasons why. There is DEFINITELY room for both viewpoints here: so don't go around acting like the other side is the stupidest, craziest thing you've ever heard and that they should just shut up.

If it weren't for all the flaming and name calling, this would be a wonderfully interesting thread.
 
Well, it has happened elsewhere, hasn't it? With success, I might add.

Now I'm not saying it's a good idea. I'm not saying it's a bad idea. I don't think it's commercially viable. I do think it's an interesting discussion.

But what I don't get is why people get so damn DEFENSE while they're shooting down this idea. Why does it bother people so much that someone had an idea that they think is bad? Why do people feel the need to insult and ridicule him?? Let's try and have a civilized discussion here, people. If you think it's a terrible idea, ok, say so and give us some intelligent reasons why. And if you think it's a good idea, give us some intelligent reasons why. There is DEFINITELY room for both viewpoints here: so don't go around acting like the other side is the stupidest, craziest thing you've ever heard and that they should just shut up.

If it weren't for all the flaming and name calling, this would be a wonderfully interesting thread.

It doesn't bother me at all that it's a dumb idea. And I didn't flame the OP, I flamed the idea.
 

Latest posts