• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Yamaha TRBX vs. RBX - what's the difference?

Killed_by_Death

Snaggletooth
Inactive
Jan 2, 2015
24,890
61,257
14 Megameters from Groong Tehp
A lovely TRBX was spotted today & was wondering what the difference is vs. my current RBX.

The Yamaha site has the basic information & there doesn't seem to be any real difference, or is the TRBX a neck-through design?

Yeah, I should have noticed today, but no I didn't look to see if it's bolt-on or neck-thru.

IMG_20160918_113248631-TB.jpg


add:

answered my own question with a search

yamaha_trbx174ew-nt_5.jpg

so now I know it's not neck through, but there seems to be nothing to separate it from the RBX except the finish of the wood
My RBX is mango as well, but it's finished darker.

changing instruments purely for the finish is something I never thought I'd do, but here I sit contemplating taking my RBX down there for a A/B comparison tomorrow (about 100 miles)
 
Last edited:
I was under the impression that the TRBX was billed as a sort of hybrid between the TRB and RBX series basses, body style similar to the former with the scale length of the latter or something to that effect. There are a couple offerings in the TRBX series that are passive; namely, the 174 and 174EWs that have already been referred to. Those have a P-J style pickup configuration. The TRBX204 has the same pickup configuration with active electronics.

Just a quick plug for the TRBX series in general, since I happened to see this thread - I'm a newfound believer. I'm a pretty staunch J bass enthusiast but when I went looking for a 5er to add to the arsenal, I just didn't feel like shelling out Cadillac money for an Elite or even a US standard. I snooped around and wound up very impressed with the features and build of the TRBX505. I found a spotless store demo on Reverb and bought it sight unseen for about $100 under list, it was on my porch the very next morning, and being used on my gig that night. It's a great playing instrument, familiar J-style pickup configuration (these are humbuckers, but the pickup blend concept remains), and at the nominally $549 pricepoint, I couldn't find anything I liked better. I think the store I bought it from had done a setup at some point, so the action is very nice, but I'm going to have it re-done around a different brand of strings. I don't know what's currently on it. It's a comfortable body with good balance, fast neck, and sound-wise it sits nicely in my ear. What impressed me most in that regard was how similar the passive and active sounds were, both tonally and level-wise. You can tell which is which but they're smartly matched, and there's also a dying battery indicator on board. I'd have no qualms whatsoever about flipping to passive mode in the middle of a song if I had to, and I don't think I've ever played another instrument I'd say the same thing about. 34" was not my first scale choice for a 5, but for the money, I decided to take a chance and I'm very glad I did. I got mine with the trans brown finish and it's quite beautiful. It's drawn quite a few compliments.

IMHO, there's some great value built into the TRBX series in general. And I'm not a paid endorser or anything, just a satisfied customer. These basses are very worth a demo if you run across them!
 
When I first got my RBX 760A, I grew not to like the chunkier neck. But after getting a little better and going through some basses, I've grown to like it, and it's built so well, I strung it BEAD.
 

Latest posts