• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Zero Fret ... What Does It Do?

Many 60's era budget basses used them. I think that's where they got a bad rap. Then there was the 70's brass nut craze which was like a zero fret with none of the advantages! MTD's (at least some) have them, as does my Mensinger. One thing it precludes is the weird overtone-y sounds you can get from a nut that doesn't provide a proper witness point.

BBB
 
At one time it was associated with cheap Japanese imports. I like adding extra beefy brass nuts , preferably screwed down, to give open strings every chance to sound as good or better than fretted notes.
1C0D8A03-433C-4CFC-B2D5-628F5A0FF6EF.jpeg
 
Rick Turner used to say that he thought the zero fret was a great thing on basses (paraphrasing). But, he said he stopped using it years ago because it was much maligned due to the use by companies building cheap basses and he was tired of fighting the battle.

He may have said that, but I'm skeptical of that being his main reason for abandoning the zero frets, or any part of his reason. ** Obviously a 0-fret adds to labor costs, limits the number of prospective buyers who may not understand, or even like the concept (or actively dislike it). Many (most?) of is main competitors don't use the zero fret, and it doesn't seem to have interfered with their sales by not using it.

In the event of accidentally over-slotting a metal zero fret during a build (yes, some zero frets have grooves cut from the factory (ala Sandberg, on occasion) would it not be easier to correct that error on a non-metal nut, rather than re-doing a zero-fret (seriously asking, I don't know)?

** Exhibit a): Every Turner bass I've seen or owned has had a scarf joint (aka "luthiers joint"?) to attach the headstock. I believe this is primarily a wood saving constuction technique which is typically a joint found on budget-level basses (cheap imports, entry-level Ibanez, etc.) No? If Turner was concerned about a zero fret/cheap bass connection, why would he not be concerned with those fugly neck scarf joints that, IMO scream "cheapo bass"? Or did he disco the scarf joints also?
 
As others have said and since I use it for my guitar builds. When setup properly, Better staying in tune (using a tusq nut filed properly to near fretboard level) and a more accurate intonation.
And it does help with those issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sternodox
He may have said that, but I'm skeptical of that being his main reason for abandoning the zero frets, or any part of his reason. ** Obviously a 0-fret adds to labor costs, limits the number of prospective buyers who may not understand, or even like the concept (or actively dislike it). Many (most?) of is main competitors don't use the zero fret, and it doesn't seem to have interfered with their sales by not using it.

In the event of accidentally over-slotting a metal zero fret during a build (yes, some zero frets have grooves cut from the factory (ala Sandberg, on occasion) would it not be easier to correct that error on a non-metal nut, rather than re-doing a zero-fret (seriously asking, I don't know)?

** Exhibit a): Every Turner bass I've seen or owned has had a scarf joint (aka "luthiers joint"?) to attach the headstock. I believe this is primarily a wood saving constuction technique which is typically a joint found on budget-level basses (cheap imports, entry-level Ibanez, etc.) No? If Turner was concerned about a zero fret/cheap bass connection, why would he not be concerned with those fugly neck scarf joints that, IMO scream "cheapo bass"? Or did he disco the scarf joints also?

This is news to me. I wasn't aware that zero frets are also supposed to be slotted, not crowned to the desired height relative to the 1st fret.

I've never used or set one up. For that matter, I can't recall ever playing any bass with zero fret.

I believe @micguy also makes a good point about finger damping from the fretting hand or the absence of it.
 
Last edited:
i like that it makes the distance between the saddle and the tuning peg just a bit longer without changing the scale length. this helps keep the fat part of the string off of the tuning post, which i understand is "better" for some reason... so yeah, even though i don't really know why it's better, i like it anyway... ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueTalon
This is news to me. I wasn't aware that zero frets are also supposed to be slotted, not crowned to the desired height relative to the 1st fret.

I've never used or set one up. For that matter, I can't recall ever playing any bass with zero fret.

I believe @micguy also makes a good point about finger damping from the fretting hand or the absence of it.

Good question. I don't know if they're supposed to be slotted. May depend on the builder's intent. I know for sure that Sandberg cuts grooves in their zero frets. Just checked my Sandbergs, all four have one or more factory-cut grooves in the zero frets. There have been previous TB posts re Sandbergs having slotted zero frets. Everyone knows Sandberg makes a superior product, so evidently for Sandberg, zero frets are supposed to be factory-slotted, ad hoc.

If I had a choice I'd pass on the zero frets. I may be too blunt to percieve the benefit, and I like to do my own fret leveling. I'd feel the need for more research on fret leveling with a zero fret involved. And I'm lazy.
 
All of the above answers are correct. It is just one more way to make a nut. I've built several instruments with them, but IMHO, it's not superior to other methods.

Hey, tell me that's not a '73-ish water-cooled 2-stroke, 3 cyl, Suzuki 750 in your avatar.

Nevermind, I know it is. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Water buffalo