• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Surprised by the EB-3

I was in the local GC today, noodling around on some of the new Jag Specials, when I saw an Epiphone "Worn" EB-3 sitting in a stand a few feet away. Curiosity got the better of me, so I picked it up and played it.

Now I really don't like the SG shape, the 2+2 headstock, the control layout, or basses with set necks in general. But I was pleasantly surprised by 1) the fit and finish 2) the playability and 3) the sound of this particular sample.

It was pretty nicely put together. The cherry finish was smooth and even, the controls worked as they should, the fretwork was solid and the neck...really sweet rosewood board, cool inlays and honestly, it felt like butter. Yes, it was that nice to play. I'm a big fan of J necks, and I didn't even notice it had a 1.65" nut until after I looked at the specs.

I snagged a cable and plugged it into a small Acoustic amp. I was waiting for the overflow of mud, but I never found it. Yes, the tone was definitely on the murky side of things, but I was expecting much worse, given the location of the neck pickup. The bridge pickup was a little weak, but the two together were a pretty nice balance. I wasn't exactly blown away, but the tone was solid.

I've read the reviews, and many folks bash the EB-3 for everything from crappy build quality to buckets of mud pickups to horrendous neck dive. To be fair, I only played it sitting down, so I can't speak to the neck dive issue, but I found nothing but a pretty nice bass for the price. Granted, this was the "limited edition" version, but I'm seriously thinking of plunking down my $299 on one. Not really my style, but I couldn't help but be impressed with the way it played.

EB-3 owners, what do you love (or hate) about this bass?
 
the Epi EB-3s don't have the mudbucker the older Gibsons had. it looks like it but that's about all, which as why it wasn't muddy sounding. modern Epiphones are built much better than the ones built in the 70s & 80s but it's hard to shed a rep for low quality. many people would be surprised if they actually tried one.
 
the Epi EB-3s don't have the mudbucker the older Gibsons had. it looks like it but that's about all, which as why it wasn't muddy sounding. modern Epiphones are built much better than the ones built in the 70s & 80s but it's hard to shed a rep for low quality. many people would be surprised if they actually tried one.

Well, it surprised me.

I had never played one before, but I had read a number of negative reviews about the Epi EB-3: muddiness, poor tone, bad build quality, etc.. I realize that you're going to have a certain number of bad reviews with almost any bass, but I guess I was prepared to be underwhelmed. But I was pleasantly surprised with the overall quality of the bass, impressed with the sound, and in love with the neck. And as I previously mentioned, I am not a fan of the SG-styled basses. At all.

Yes, the Epiphone neck pickup has way less mud than the original Gibson. Was this the short or long scale version?

I understand there is (or will be?) a limited edition of short scale Epiphone EB3s, but I haven't seen one yet

This was a 34". The EB-3 Elitist Series was a 30.5" scale, but they were discontinued years ago.
 
I like EBs--never owned one, always wanted to(growing up I always thought Wyman and Dunaway sounded and looked cool with them)---in my case, I'd go with the shorty and flats to get the thumpy sound I associate with them. Maybe I should try an Epi--the price is right.

Then a Marshall to play it through:

Invalid Link Removed

(That classic bass part comes in at 2:36)