Double Bass Realist or L.R. Baggs?

If your bass has a preponderance of high end, (lots o highs)
than the realist may be ok. On my carved basses, its mostly
lowend and boomy. BUT!!! The realist can sound very different
on each bass. Do you have the fishman pro eq, or the "bass"
version pro eq? The bass version is pretty versitile. If you
can't get a decent sound with it, it might be time for a pickup
change. What are you not getting now? Also, try going from
the pro eq directly into the effects return input on the back
of the amp, instead of the front input. this way you will bypass the swr preamp. Make sure the effects blend knob is
all the way up on the amp. Use the fishman as the only
preamp, you may like the sound alot more.

I used to have a Realist on my New Standard Cleveland laminated bass. Now it has a K&K BassMax and a Schertler Stat-B. I run these through a Fishman Pro Platinum Bass EQ, a Baggs Para-DI, or a SansAmp Bass Driver/DI, into the FX return of a GK400RB driving a Bergantino HT112 or EA Wizzy 112.

On my bass, it was difficult to get any sort of growling mids or note definition from the Realist, even with a preamp. Both the BassMax and Stat-B have better mids/highs while retaining a full bottom end. I haven't used an Underwood myself, but the BassMax is a cheap (~$90) way to get a different tone that's guaranteed to cut better than a Realist.

I'd have to disagree with your guitarist. Neither the Fishman or Baggs "sucks tone", but I consider the Fishman to be definitely the more neutral-sounding unit (with controls set flat, the pre/post XLR-out tones are identical). The Para-DI seems to have a bit more of a cutting midrange, and its bass control is voiced much higher (80hz vs the Fishman's 30 hz). The Baggs has a preset 35hz hi-pass filter (the Fishman's is variable between 15 and 125hz), and it seems to have a significantly higher output from the 1/4" jack. Plus there's no ground lift switch or pre/post switch for the XLR (possibly problematic if you're using both an amp and PA), and while it has a TRS FX insert jack, there's no dedicated tuner out. Both units have a phase reverse switch, very handy for fighting feedback.

That said, I find the Baggs to be more musical-sounding. The EQ on the Baggs seems more like "tone control" (with the semi-parametric notch and midrange you can get many different sounds), whereas the EQ on the Fishman feels (to me) like you're just adding/subtracting so many dBs at different frequencies. However, with my setup I find myself using minimal EQ (I usually cut a tiny bit of highs/upper mids) and the variable lo-cut and compressor on the Fishman are very helpful

I like both and wouldn't want to be without either right now. The SansAmp BDDI is a whole different kettle of fish--it's much more electric sounding, but I haven't tried their Acoustic DI--which many DB'ers love. See if you can try a Baggs before buying; you should be able to find one used for less than $100. As for the Realist, it responds differently on every bass, but you probably won't get too many highs from it on a laminate.

I happen to own both the Baggs Paracoustic preamp AND two Fishmans, the older Pro-EQ (not the current Platinum) and the Dual Parametric. The Fishmans sound alike (no surprise) with EQ flat, both sound fatter than the Baggs but the Baggs is more detailed and "airy" sounding. That jives with Winston's claim that the Baggs emphasizes mids.

As far as Realist vs. Underwood, on my beater bass the Realist gives me more highs and string detail than the Underwood did. But on my Juzek (also lam) the Realist was murky sounding so I switched to K&K Bass Max and Schertler Stat-B (hmm, just liike Winston again) and they sounded much better.

How any pickup will sound is very much dependent on the bass to which it's mounted. I guess the real question is what sort of tonal change you are hoping to hear with a different pickup or preamp.

Your first post stopped me for a moment...I use an Underwood, a Pro-EQ and a WM-12, but the bass is an American Standard. I've also tried a Baggs preamp and a Realist.

The Realist didn't work well with my bass...I think the Underwood does better because it hears more strings than body and my bass is a bit dead around low A on the E string.

The Baggs had nice features, but I think the Fishman is more neutral sounding.

You might try your setup with a different amp before swapping out the pickup and preamp. The WM12 sounds nice, but it's a bit middy.

It seems like you are constantly fighting the sound of
the amp you are using. Most electric bass amps are not
meant for a piezo pickup, or an acoustic bass. Most of
the guys i know seem happiest when they either get an
amp with upright in mind (acoustic image for instance)
or get a good preamp (d-tar, fishman, baggs, etc) and
bypass the preamp on the amp they are using. Most amps
have an effects loop. Go from the preamp out, into
the effects return input, master volume and/or blend
knob turned up. It never ceases to amaze me, how guys
can get a natural pleasant sound out of amps like a
peavey tnt. I can't even get a good electric sound out
of one of those beasts. I think my old Walter Woods amp
spoils me.

I've got a '39 Kay. I've never tried anything other than the Realist. Never had to sonic need to, it's just always sounded like the bass sounds. I thought about the K&K at one time, but I'm trying to limit the amount of "change just to change" excercises I bring upon myself with set-up and gear these days. The right string exploration is enough.

You might take a peak at the Raven Labs stuff. I also pondered the Presonus Acoutic-Q. I've not tried one, but I like their other stuff.

Lastly, I hear Roland has come out with an upright specific amp.

Good luck with it.

Blimpdog said:

The Underwood/Fishman combo sounds okay in some situations but too midrangy-honky and/or electric sounding in others.

Click to expand...

If you are using NO preamp currently, either the Baggs or Fishman preamp will help in three ways:

1. The impedance buffering will get rid of some of the honkiness immediately and aftten up the lows

2. The EQ can be used to dial out most of the rest of the honkiness.

3. The XLR out can be used to send your signal to the PA; in some rooms I'll go ampless and use the PA monitors instead. Less stuff to carry and often sounds better.

I have found that the area around 800Hz is where "honk" lies so that's where I immediately start tweaking the EQ. With either of my preamps I can get a pretty usable tone out of almost any bass amp (yes, I was recently saddled with a TNT and was able to tame even that after some persistent knob twisting).

I consider my preamps essential if I will be using any amps other than my own.

I have a Kay Bass about the same age as Blimpdog's.
The Realist works quite well with it. Old school, yes!