TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Weasel said:Link Removed
Odd enough!
Weasel said:Warwick thumb it is, that part I knew
But how does this fret placement works? Do you know more about it?
dlloyd said:You see a slightly more palatable idea with the fretwave system...
Invalid Link Removed
This adjusts the thirds on some of the more commonly used open chords to make them sound slightly better.
peter griffin said:Why not just go and master fretless if you want to be that accurate.
dlloyd said:You see a slightly more palatable idea with the fretwave system...
This adjusts the thirds on some of the more commonly used open chords to make them sound slightly better.
Dirk Diggler said:I had thought that was a micro-tonal fret job. The octave is divided into much smaller than 12 parts. And I have to agree if you want to play that much in between the scale a fretless would be easier, plus the slides.
Dirk
dlloyd said:There's a few different approaches to JI that allow you to play in a number of different keys. Here's a headache inducing version...
Dirk Diggler said:I had thought that was a micro-tonal fret job. The octave is divided into much smaller than 12 parts. And I have to agree if you want to play that much in between the scale a fretless would be easier, plus the slides.
Dirk

JMX said:Well, those are two different things.
Dirk Diggler said:I had thought that was a micro-tonal fret job. The octave is divided into much smaller than 12 parts. And I have to agree if you want to play that much in between the scale a fretless would be easier, plus the slides.
Dirk
SuperSonic!!! said:What a joke. Can't people just play bass and get on with it?