I started a thread over at
http://www.bluegrassbassplace.com/ recently about Upton basses and it quickly turned into a discussion about how Upton String Instrument Companyas a commercial user and supporter here at TB, gets preferential treatment. I don't think that's the case.
You're right, it's not the case. We have many registered commercial users and advertisers here on the board, and we do our best to keep all of them on a pretty short leash as far as the rules of the Commercial Users Policy are concerned. I think if you asked Gary Upton if Paul and the moderators give him special treatment, he would laugh at you and probably offer to send you a long list of PM's in which we moderators have suggested to him that his abundant exuberance has led him slightly beyond the limits of allowable comments by commercial users. The same is true of all of our advertisers, because all are valued members of the ongoing discussion here as well as being businessmen and women, and the strict rules of the Commercial Users Policy are easy to transgress in a simple discussion about basses.
It is true that Gary and Eroy participate in the threads with greater vigor than most commercial users, and it is also true that one of their customers,
DRURB, is a loyal supporter of their products and services (as it his right to be) who can be counted on to chime in in defense of Upton if a negative opinion is expressed. There's nothing against the rules with that, and it has nothing to do with the administrators of TalkBass. (Besides, at least two of the DB mods play and enjoy Arnold Schnitzer's New Standard basses...

and you won't catch us shoving them down people's throats.)
Someone posting to my thread said that Ken Smith was banned here at TB for posting an anti Upton rant, and another person told a story of how she and her husband were PMed by the TB administrators and told to register as commecial users because of a post they submitted about their hobby shop in their home where they re-furb basses. She was convinced that Gary Upton had released the TB hounds on her.
Remember, Mr. Smith is also subject to the CUP, and commercial users are specifically requested not to get into it about each other's products regardless of how valid the points made may be.
As for the husband-and-wife team: in the first place, Gary Upton has no TB hounds to release if he wanted to; in the second place, he had nothing to do with our noticing that situation; and in the third place, there is no shame in being asked to register as a Commercial User here if that is indeed what you are. We have many users who operate bass-related businesses who begin posting here without realizing the requirements made of commercial users, and when the moderators noticed the thread in question it looked like the posts were being made by someone with a shop who was restoring basses for possible resale. (It's an easy conclusion to come to when people are talking about how "we just got this one bass in that we're restoring" and so forth.)
A search for all threads about Upton basses will tell you one thing, but you won't be able to see all of the posts we have deleted from the altercations that have broken out. If everyone could see the missing pieces, you all would know that the idea of a pro-Upton slant by the TB administration is comical.