I've been hearing how Monster Cables are suing a lot of companies for either having "Monster" in the name or produce high quality cables.
Very recently they started a case against Blue Jeans Cable. Unbeknownst to them, the owner was a lawyer in a previous life and told them their claim was frivilous and was simply a bully tactic to scare off the competition. (http://www.audioholics.com/news/industry-news/blue-jeans-strikes-back.
As pointed out in a reply from a Halloween shop (with the name monster.biz) which fought back and won, with Monster Cables agreeing to fork out legal costs, they stated that the word "Monster" existed before the company did, and their copyright of a Halloween store could not possibly infringe on their audio market image. (http://www.madmartian.com/legal/apology_response.htm)
Very recently they started a case against Blue Jeans Cable. Unbeknownst to them, the owner was a lawyer in a previous life and told them their claim was frivilous and was simply a bully tactic to scare off the competition. (http://www.audioholics.com/news/industry-news/blue-jeans-strikes-back.
As pointed out in a reply from a Halloween shop (with the name monster.biz) which fought back and won, with Monster Cables agreeing to fork out legal costs, they stated that the word "Monster" existed before the company did, and their copyright of a Halloween store could not possibly infringe on their audio market image. (http://www.madmartian.com/legal/apology_response.htm)
