In the interest of fair reporting, I'm posting a reponse from Monster Cables CEO, Noel Lee in regards to reports of frivilous suits against name trademarks.
http://www.audioholics.com/news/pre...ssage-from-noel-lee/?searchterm=monster cable
Please note, the letter was sent directly through their legal department. Monster admit to "4 trademark oppositions a year".
However, this letter does not deal with the issue against Blue Jeans Cable and Mr. Denke.
Audioholics reported "Design patents represent nothing more that that: design. There is no technological content within design patents. The net effect is that Monster cable suing Blue Jeans is like you suing someone who copied the custom paint job on your car."
I await with interest Monster's reply to Mr Denke.
NB. I have edited to original post to make it more focused, dealing with the issues of the Halloween company operating on monster.biz and Blue Jeans Cable, the latter being the main reason the issue was brought up here.
http://www.audioholics.com/news/pre...ssage-from-noel-lee/?searchterm=monster cable
Please note, the letter was sent directly through their legal department. Monster admit to "4 trademark oppositions a year".
However, this letter does not deal with the issue against Blue Jeans Cable and Mr. Denke.
Audioholics reported "Design patents represent nothing more that that: design. There is no technological content within design patents. The net effect is that Monster cable suing Blue Jeans is like you suing someone who copied the custom paint job on your car."
I await with interest Monster's reply to Mr Denke.
NB. I have edited to original post to make it more focused, dealing with the issues of the Halloween company operating on monster.biz and Blue Jeans Cable, the latter being the main reason the issue was brought up here.
-