• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

NEW FROM GHS - Tapewounds! (Re-introduced)

32's usually need 34" winding length, can sometimes work with longer, always looking for more medium scale options

I don't know about medium scale winding length... but I've just noticed on GHS website that the winding length for the Tapewound is their latest 37.25" winding length. There are other GHS strings with their "older" 36.5" winding length which I could not use on my go to 35" scale bass, cause it requires a minimum of 37" winding length strings.
 
I wonder if they will come in more than just 34”? These were gone by the time I got to them on my tapes journey and I’m glad to see them back.

Now, how about some medium scale pressurewounds? Or medium scale bronze pressurewound!

Got them 34 inch winding length blues

^ Don't know why it's not a song because I sing it already. Maybe just not a hit song ....
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikewalker
:) Hoping to see a double-ball-end version of these!

Unfortunately, that's not going to happen. Like @SLaPiNFuNK already stated, making double-ball strings is incredibly tricky (they have about 3x the steps as standard rounds), let alone tapewounds in that configuration.


This whole “round wound G string” tossed in the set has me concerned with these, why make one string differently?

Why should it be a concern at all? The idea was to have tonality that is equal across all strings; a flatwound G was too dark sounding under the nylon tape. So, it's roundwound and the other are flat, and it sounds correct.



I wonder if they will come in more than just 34”? These were gone by the time I got to them on my tapes journey and I’m glad to see them back.

It's a possibility, but not in the immediate future. If anything, I'd rather we offer a tapewound C string for those people that would like these on a 6 string bass, or want to tune EADGC.


Now, how about some medium scale pressurewounds?

We had them. They were discontinued about five years ago.


Or medium scale bronze pressurewound!

That's a niche string already, so to have them offered in a scale length that's even more uncommon would be an incredibly hard sell.
 
Yes, was a sad day the med scale pressurewounds disappeared. I get the business logic of your statements of course. I just keep hoping that some string company will go further in offering variations across materials and scales, even if expensive. After all lots of us will shell out for TI flats, I’m sure we would for other specialty strings too.

I’d buy a set of bronze pressurewounds today if they would fit my ABG, but I’m not going to buy them and then weep when they break because of misfit.

I do appreciate your response - thank you

Unfortunately, that's not going to happen. Like @SLaPiNFuNK already stated, making double-ball strings is incredibly tricky (they have about 3x the steps as standard rounds), let alone tapewounds in that configuration.




Why should it be a concern at all? The idea was to have tonality that is equal across all strings; a flatwound G was too dark sounding under the nylon tape. So, it's roundwound and the other are flat, and it sounds correct.





It's a possibility, but not in the immediate future. If anything, I'd rather we offer a tapewound C string for those people that would like these on a 6 string bass, or want to tune EADGC.




We had them. They were discontinued about five years ago.




That's a niche string already, so to have them offered in a scale length that's even more uncommon would be an incredibly hard sell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikewalker
Yep. The original had to be discontinued due to an issue with the nylon tape availability. So, we figured out a solution.
I just found a set that had been sitting around collecting dust after searching for a year...old packaging...and I felt like I'd won the lottery.
I've had a set on my L2000 since I bought it last September...definitely my favorite strings.
Is there any appreciable difference between the old and new strings?
The ones I have are going on the next G&L I buy, but I'm thinking about buying some for my Reverend Thundergun.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trothwell
That's good news. I put my first set of them on my 67' Guild Starfire in 68' or early 69'. They've always been my favorite tapes.
Here's the only picture of it I have. Taken in 72'.
 

Attachments

  • fullsizeoutput_556.jpeg
    fullsizeoutput_556.jpeg
    891 KB · Views: 49
  • Like
Reactions: GwenOnBass
According to @Jon Moody, the new re-introduced version of these are basically the same as the old version.

With that in mind, here are the tension figures for them, taken from the Aug-2014 version of the GHS Tension Guide, for those who care about such trials things in life. ;)

G 050 - 41.0
D 070 - 48.0
A 090 - 44.6
E 105 - 34.2 (Total: 167.8 lbs.)

Something I've noticed, though, is the old 5-string set had a .125 for the low B, while the new set comes with a .130.