• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

NBD - IT’S ALIVE!!!

I originally wrote a very long post about this on Easter, shortly after getting this incredible instrument back from the luthier. Unfortunately, I tried to upload right when the server went down, and lost the entire thing. I’m not going to try and recreate it, I’ll just roll with where I’m at now.

I owned a very old fragile instrument that was never going to see a gig and I didn’t want to care for it anymore. Unfortunately, it had an ugly headstock repair that was actually super solid and well executed, but nobody was going to bite online unless I let it go for low dough. So... I started looking around at vintage dealers within a days drive to possibly trade for a bass. I found a dealer in Providence (an hour from me) that had some promising looking basses. I tried a couple, and one really caught my eye. Actually, my ear and shoulder. It had a great, hot, full range pickup with some “hair” to it and was very light weight (SIX POUNDS) It wasn’t very left-hand friendly, however.

It was a 1955 Multivox Marvel.

They were manufactured without a truss rod, or even a separate fretboard. The neck is just a big oil’ billet with a flat milled surface and frets sunk into it.
This particular one had lived a very hard life, many gigs. I suppose the neck had actually held up for awhile, but when I played it, the neck had about 3/16” -1/4” relief at the twelfth fret. The first five frets actually played okay, almost well enough to gig on... almost. I loved the way it felt in my hands, hung on the strap, looked, and most importantly,sounded. I thought- I will deal with this somehow, and make this a gigging instrument. The scale length was actually 34 1/2, so it played rather like a fender, although the string spacing is much tighter (16-17 mm). The tech at the shop actually did a pretty good job getting it to play in tune up the neck and making it marginally playable. A Herculean effort, since the bridge was just a crude “biscuit” design. Apparently he spent many hours doing so, much to the chagrin of his boss. I don’t know what I was thinking, I guess I just fell in love. We reached a deal-in addition to the bass, they gave me a nice, unusual nylon string guitar and a decent wad of cash. They made out like bandits, but I was actually pretty happy, even though over half of my trade value went towards a project bass. This is what I brought home:View attachment 4246272So, my first thought towards addressing playability was to actually procure an adjustable bridge with the proper spacing. I ordered one from Hipshot. I was thinking I could actually get the action low enough to handle light strings/detuning and still intonate. That may have been the case, but I started making inquiries to local luthiers (there are several top notch ones here- I am very fortunate in that regard). I talked to one about installing a truss rod and he flat out refused- but offered to make a repro neck instead, telling me it would be much cheaper and would likely be much stronger and more durable than a retrofitted rod. I said “Yes please!”

We discussed the details, and he offered to make it with a Macassar Ebony board since he got a good deal on a whole bunch. I love ebony, so although it’s taking it far from being a repro, I couldn’t resist. He balked a little at using guitar tuners, but I really wanted to keep the vibe and balance of the original. When I told him I would custom order them from Hipshot as well, he agreed.

If anyone out there is thinking of doing something similar, please know that Hipshot will bore out the string holes on certain guitar tuners (*not all models) up to .060 to accommodate large (I.e. bass) strings. I think it’s a modest up charge and adds to the wait, but boy, is it worth it! They work beautifully.

So after waiting several weeks for the tuners, (I already had the bridge, too) I took the whole mess over to his shop and dropped it off. He said it would be quite a while before he got to it, I said “I don’t care, as long as I can gig it next summer”. He laughed and told me I would have it long before then, but it might be six months. It was more like eight. I didn’t care, I’ve been keeping busy. After I got it back, I REALLY didn’t care! This thing is amazing.View attachment 4246289

Cool save :thumbsup: - I know the feeling when you resurrect a unique vintage bass from cobwebs to playability. Where did you get a Marvel hs decal? And it's too bad you didn't work on the original bridge to make it useable. Vintage Dano's are similar and having resurrected a few I know it can be done. The neck is good though - very much in the spirit of the original.

@GretschWretch
 
First off, a huge thank-you to @JIO for tipping me off to this; I would have missed the entire thread otherwise.

And ALL CAPS respect to OP for having the sense and discretion to preserve as much as possible of the instrument's integrity. Everything you did, so far as I can tell, is reversible, although this particular bass is such a battle-scarred old warhorse I doubt it will ever be collectible. I especially appreciate the ad, which I had not seen before.

OP's is only the fourth of these basses I have seen with a finished neck. The first one was a museum quality purported 1955 which rattled around the web for years, probably because the asking price was $5500.

The second is a purported 1959 owned by our own @godofthunder59. Scott has posted a Youtube review of his bass.



The third finished neck bass is OP's. The fourth is one I discovered while seeking images of the first one, and is here

Multivox Marvel Bass 1955 Sunburst - Extremely Rare | Dukes Vintage | Reverb

Yes, the necks are chunky, probably because they have no truss rods; but then the original Fender necks had no truss rods either. And unlike Fenders, Marvel basses seem to have no deadspots. Neck bow may be a problem on these basses, but I think that a lot of the playability problems are because the some fret-levelling is required.

I find the neck profile to be intriguing because of the similarities to the necks of the Magnatone Mark VI

12912580_958417947607407_192293693_n-jpg.jpg


and Gretsch Bikini duo



Sorkin/Marvel, Gretsch, and the Mark series Magnatones at the time were all made in the New York/Philly area, and I would not be at all surprised if there was some cross-pollination going on.

The pickguard on OP's bass is a replacement made to original spec; original pickguards on this instrument have a high mortality rate. Except for the neck screws and pickguard, everything on OP's bass to me appears original.

The bridge and tailpiece are pure Magic Eight Ball: mispositioned, non-intonable, and purely parts bin luck of the draw. Perform a Google Images search for Multivox Marvel and you will see that bridge/tailpiece options are all over the place. In fact, the Images search is instructive just to illustrate the infinite variety of the guitars as compared to the basses.

If you want to try to intonate the original bridge, just tap the restraining pins through the base of the tailpiece. This will give you the backward and forward movement necessary to achieve intonation. Or at least come close.

In spite of what the ad says, mensure is 33 7/8 inch. And the construction is not solid; it is chambered, like early Danelectros: a wooden frame with top and back caps. That is why it is so light.

Variations I have seen:
Sunburst w/maple neck and 2+2 headstock (like mine)
Sunburst w/shaded neck and 2+2 headstock (Scott's and OP's)
Black w/four-in-line headstock
Dual pickup sunburst w/four-in-line headstock
Red (holy cow! How did THAT get in there? I WANT IT!!!)

This is about all I got. Thanks for renewing my appreciation for these instruments.
 
First off, a huge thank-you to @JIO for tipping me off to this; I would have missed the entire thread otherwise.

And ALL CAPS respect to OP for having the sense and discretion to preserve as much as possible of the instrument's integrity. Everything you did, so far as I can tell, is reversible, although this particular bass is such a battle-scarred old warhorse I doubt it will ever be collectible. I especially appreciate the ad, which I had not seen before.

OP's is only the fourth of these basses I have seen with a finished neck. The first one was a museum quality purported 1955 which rattled around the web for years, probably because the asking price was $5500.

The second is a purported 1959 owned by our own @godofthunder59. Scott has posted a Youtube review of his bass.



The third finished neck bass is OP's. The fourth is one I discovered while seeking images of the first one, and is here

Multivox Marvel Bass 1955 Sunburst - Extremely Rare | Dukes Vintage | Reverb

Yes, the necks are chunky, probably because they have no truss rods; but then the original Fender necks had no truss rods either. And unlike Fenders, Marvel basses seem to have no deadspots. Neck bow may be a problem on these basses, but I think that a lot of the playability problems are because the some fret-levelling is required.

I find the neck profile to be intriguing because of the similarities to the necks of the Magnatone Mark VI

View attachment 4261645

and Gretsch Bikini duo



Sorkin/Marvel, Gretsch, and the Mark series Magnatones at the time were all made in the New York/Philly area, and I would not be at all surprised if there was some cross-pollination going on.

The pickguard on OP's bass is a replacement made to original spec; original pickguards on this instrument have a high mortality rate. Except for the neck screws and pickguard, everything on OP's bass to me appears original.

The bridge and tailpiece are pure Magic Eight Ball: mispositioned, non-intonable, and purely parts bin luck of the draw. Perform a Google Images search for Multivox Marvel and you will see that bridge/tailpiece options are all over the place. In fact, the Images search is instructive just to illustrate the infinite variety of the guitars as compared to the basses.

If you want to try to intonate the original bridge, just tap the restraining pins through the base of the tailpiece. This will give you the backward and forward movement necessary to achieve intonation. Or at least come close.

In spite of what the ad says, mensure is 33 7/8 inch. And the construction is not solid; it is chambered, like early Danelectros: a wooden frame with top and back caps. That is why it is so light.

Variations I have seen:
Sunburst w/maple neck and 2+2 headstock (like mine)
Sunburst w/shaded neck and 2+2 headstock (Scott's and OP's)
Black w/four-in-line headstock
Dual pickup sunburst w/four-in-line headstock
Red (holy cow! How did THAT get in there? I WANT IT!!!)

This is about all I got. Thanks for renewing my appreciation for these instruments.


Always liked "Red Rubber Ball" back then but hearing it again after many years, it was clearly one of the transitional songs from folk to pop genre that was pioneered by Simon and Garfunkel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: godofthunder59
In some situations yes, in others, no. I don’t know whether it’s humcancelling or not. My guess is not. Definitely something to think about when I start gigging this. May have to hunt down a pedal based solution.
Dope bass bro. Electro harmonix hum de-bugger. It could silence a chainsaw.
 
  • Like
Reactions: klyph
I originally wrote a very long post about this on Easter, shortly after getting this incredible instrument back from the luthier. Unfortunately, I tried to upload right when the server went down, and lost the entire thing. I’m not going to try and recreate it, I’ll just roll with where I’m at now.

I owned a very old fragile instrument that was never going to see a gig and I didn’t want to care for it anymore. Unfortunately, it had an ugly headstock repair that was actually super solid and well executed, but nobody was going to bite online unless I let it go for low dough. So... I started looking around at vintage dealers within a days drive to possibly trade for a bass. I found a dealer in Providence (an hour from me) that had some promising looking basses. I tried a couple, and one really caught my eye. Actually, my ear and shoulder. It had a great, hot, full range pickup with some “hair” to it and was very light weight (SIX POUNDS) It wasn’t very left-hand friendly, however.

It was a 1955 Multivox Marvel.

They were manufactured without a truss rod, or even a separate fretboard. The neck is just a big oil’ billet with a flat milled surface and frets sunk into it.
This particular one had lived a very hard life, many gigs. I suppose the neck had actually held up for awhile, but when I played it, the neck had about 3/16” -1/4” relief at the twelfth fret. The first five frets actually played okay, almost well enough to gig on... almost. I loved the way it felt in my hands, hung on the strap, looked, and most importantly,sounded. I thought- I will deal with this somehow, and make this a gigging instrument. The scale length was actually 34 1/2, so it played rather like a fender, although the string spacing is much tighter (16-17 mm). The tech at the shop actually did a pretty good job getting it to play in tune up the neck and making it marginally playable. A Herculean effort, since the bridge was just a crude “biscuit” design. Apparently he spent many hours doing so, much to the chagrin of his boss. I don’t know what I was thinking, I guess I just fell in love. We reached a deal-in addition to the bass, they gave me a nice, unusual nylon string guitar and a decent wad of cash. They made out like bandits, but I was actually pretty happy, even though over half of my trade value went towards a project bass. This is what I brought home:View attachment 4246272So, my first thought towards addressing playability was to actually procure an adjustable bridge with the proper spacing. I ordered one from Hipshot. I was thinking I could actually get the action low enough to handle light strings/detuning and still intonate. That may have been the case, but I started making inquiries to local luthiers (there are several top notch ones here- I am very fortunate in that regard). I talked to one about installing a truss rod and he flat out refused- but offered to make a repro neck instead, telling me it would be much cheaper and would likely be much stronger and more durable than a retrofitted rod. I said “Yes please!”

We discussed the details, and he offered to make it with a Macassar Ebony board since he got a good deal on a whole bunch. I love ebony, so although it’s taking it far from being a repro, I couldn’t resist. He balked a little at using guitar tuners, but I really wanted to keep the vibe and balance of the original. When I told him I would custom order them from Hipshot as well, he agreed.

If anyone out there is thinking of doing something similar, please know that Hipshot will bore out the string holes on certain guitar tuners (*not all models) up to .060 to accommodate large (I.e. bass) strings. I think it’s a modest up charge and adds to the wait, but boy, is it worth it! They work beautifully.

So after waiting several weeks for the tuners, (I already had the bridge, too) I took the whole mess over to his shop and dropped it off. He said it would be quite a while before he got to it, I said “I don’t care, as long as I can gig it next summer”. He laughed and told me I would have it long before then, but it might be six months. It was more like eight. I didn’t care, I’ve been keeping busy. After I got it back, I REALLY didn’t care! This thing is amazing.View attachment 4246289
Congratulations! Nice save, beautiful work glad that you are enjoying it. I really dig mine, I found it in a local store and got it cheap. I've been told mine is one of the most complete examples out there all parts seem original, even the pickguard and knobs. The neck is pretty straight I have low tension flats on it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: klyph and JIO
wooden frame with top and back caps. That is why it is so light.
It’s unfortunate I couldn’t take in-process photos, but one of the “hidden” repairs done was to route a pocket and glue in a mahogany (I think) block to accept the Hipshot bridge. I think I would have to route a small pocket in the block to use the in-body tailpiece (clearance for the ball ends behind the slots). I’m not sure, and frankly it doesn’t matter. Those bridges are terrible, and mine looks like it was attacked with a ball peen hammer at some point. I will keep it with the original neck, but I doubt either will ever be reinstalled.
 
Red (holy cow! How did THAT get in there? I WANT IT!!!)
Yeah, that red one is super sexy!
I would love to hear the two pickup version.
If you look at that ad, it says they also came in a white finish. THAT would be killer.
Even though the changes I made are reversible, this thing is basically a rat rod at this point. Like all rods, you can’t ever get the dough back out. I’m gonna play this at beach and bar gigs until the rest of the finish flakes off (it’s already happening) and then decide on a new color. Maybe I’ll make a poll ;-)
 
  • Like
Reactions: ctmullins