• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

$100 bass vs $10,000 bass

The Lindo didn't sound very good and the Fodera was lovely. The Jazz also sounded noticeably better than the Lindo.

IMO

I've seen a number of his videos. He's a good player.
The Lindo sounded like a Precision; the Jazz sounded like a Jazz and the Fedora sounded like a custom soapbar job. Those tones are not even remotely similar. Make them all P's, all J's or all soaps.
 
A few years ago I read an article in the UK Guitarist magazine where they were comparing four (if I remember correctly) boutique amplifiers and had two decent but mass produced amps as well. In the blind tests most people couldn't pick exactly which amp was which and one of the lower priced amps actually came in second on their points tally.

What really stood out to everyone was that they could pick the player on any of the amps. While there was a definite difference in each amp everyone could pick the style and tone of each other quite easily.

There is some great footage of Jimmy Page at Knebworth on the Zeppelin DVD playing Danelectro guitars. He is not playing them in service of his cheap guitar fetish; he chose them because he liked their gritty sound.
Sometimes tone is indeed where you find it.
 
Must have tasted horrible!


98f0a5d7c85e1692a65de33765d5cfb7.jpg







HONK!

Darn, the one time I was really hoping for a video clip it was just the picture.
Love the Marx Brothers.

Russ
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5StringBlues
No susbstantial difference between the three basses that can't be negated by eq, amp, etc. That's only a $10k bass, though imagine the people who spent millions for a stradivarius who later found out they couldn't be distinguished in blind tests.

The people who are saying the fodera sounded better have been placeboed. It looks better and is more expensive, but in blind tests, as has been proven over and over, no one can tell the difference. I can't believe we even have to have this discussion anymore. It's settled long long ago. You can't buy a better bass sound. I can plug in a $50 craigslist bass as long as it works and has strings, into a berhinger PA with a parametric eq and get as good a bass sound as anything.

But the benefit is having a bass and amp that is uniquely yours, that looks cool, feels good and is inspiring. I couldn't rock a "Lindo" bass and feel good about it, just like I can't wear just any clothes.
 
The Lindo sounded like a Precision; the Jazz sounded like a Jazz and the Fedora sounded like a custom soapbar job. Those tones are not even remotely similar. Make them all P's, all J's or all soaps.

Depends on how picky you want to be. Sure there were differences but step back a bit and they all sounded like a pretty good bass tone. Similar enough to really say none were better or worse than the other, though sure if you had to pick one you can. I could tell the differences of course but none sounded bad, they all sounded good and as long as the action and feel was decent I could use all three for live shows and recordings and get pretty much the same results.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JRA and avvie
Like others have said, just showing off solo slap bass over a drum machine doesn't really highlight why you'd want to drop major cash on an instrument. There is music where the finesse of your tone matters, and music where it doesn't (usually because it is a loud, rocky, dirtier style)

As someone who went through jazz school and kind of battled with a mid-range instrument that wasn't doing what I needed it to (a german warwick corvette), and then in my last year I managed to scrape up enough cash (and haggle with the store enough) that I got my hands on a proper, top quality, boutique bass. There were 2 big big differences - playability, and I don't just mean low action, I mean how effortless it became to achieve a good sounding note. I can make a squier sound decent for most stuff, but it's work, so that's going to be a bigger limitation as the music gets harder.

The second was quality of sound when it came to the finer details - I always, for example, felt bad when sax players or guitars would play what I felt were better solos, but I suspected it was a timbre thing. On a quality instrument it is easier to achieve a good tone across the neck without changing settings, and one that is present in the mix. I find on cheap basses, maybe I can get a decent walking tone, but if it comes time for a solo I will be muddy or drowned out (unless I turn up to be way too loud), so for me it really opened up a lot of music and playing possibilities. It was also the solution to basically daily anxiety I had as I felt I should be playing better music (and it turned out, hey, it was indeed the instrument)

If you want to just play slap licks or rock covers (or anything where youre behind distorted guitars really) I would not sweat the boutique instrument and focus more just on getting a decent version of the right type of bass (type of pickups) and a decent amp

Now i've got a full aguilar rig to go with my boutique bass and it's just awesome, never would have imagined sounding this good when I was a kid learning
 
No susbstantial difference between the three basses that can't be negated by eq, amp, etc. That's only a $10k bass, though imagine the people who spent millions for a stradivarius who later found out they couldn't be distinguished in blind tests.

The people who are saying the fodera sounded better have been placeboed. It looks better and is more expensive, but in blind tests, as has been proven over and over, no one can tell the difference. I can't believe we even have to have this discussion anymore. It's settled long long ago. You can't buy a better bass sound. I can plug in a $50 craigslist bass as long as it works and has strings, into a berhinger PA with a parametric eq and get as good a bass sound as anything.

But the benefit is having a bass and amp that is uniquely yours, that looks cool, feels good and is inspiring. I couldn't rock a "Lindo" bass and feel good about it, just like I can't wear just any clothes.
I really disagree. You can't buy a better bass tone if your technique is the problem. But sometimes the instrument is the problem. It depends on where a player is at with their individual journey of their skill and gear. Like I mentioned in my above post - I got to a point in jazz school where my german warwick (which you'd say is a decently solid instrument) was holding me back, so I upgraded.

I have had students who ask me about if they should upgrade their bass, and I will swap instruments with them for the lesson. I'll still be sounding better! But that's just a young student being impatient. Doesn't mean it's never the time for an instrument upgrade to = a sound upgrade (I will also add, increased playability translates to a better sound as the technique of the player is less inhibited)
 
I enjoyed his 12 string and fidget spinner videos. But I couldn't give a rat's ass about comparing a $100 bass vs a $10,000 bass. Never owned a $10,000 bass but I have owned several $100 and $200 basses, and if I have to choose between the two, I'll take the $10,000 bass any day of the week. It's not just about sound but playability.
Exactly. It's easy to make a cheap bass sound good. I find that playability/comfort is usually a bigger difference, even between two basses with good setups.

Yeah, well defined, clear tone with plenty of low end and punchy mids! Sounds pretty bad to me too!
I would disagree with your description, completely. To me it sounded a bit scooped, and very sterile.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JimmyM
This community is so negative...it's a well edited video and he plays them all fine.

Why take so many shots at the guy? If you think you can make a better comparison video, then do one yourself.

+1.

I'm not taking any shots at the guy... I like him!:roflmao:

I think most of the "negativity" that you speak of is about the premise itself... "$100 Bass > /= than a Fodera"....
I dunno about that...

Excellent, you are one of the good guys then.
PS> BTW I'm taking shots right now!

tenor.gif





Oh, that is a very interesting statement sir!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Son of Wobble
Lol I clicked on the thread expecting completely different responses. TB Never seizes to amaze me. So much hate and jelly in this thread.
-welp no fair, different pickups and specs
-if he were playing in a style where we could actually blah blah blah
-I didn't watch the video/there's no point to this/this does nothing for me (yet you still clicked and posted in the thread)
-clickbait!
-this guy sucks.

If any of this is you, you spend wayy too much time on TB(it's ok I do too). It's a fun video by a great player with a pretty original(and successful!) YouTube channel. Don't be jelly. He's not bashing the fodera, and No one cares that your bass is more expensive than you are good.

For those of you who didn't get it, the point of the video is simply that it's not about the bass, it's about the player.
 
I really disagree. You can't buy a better bass tone if your technique is the problem. But sometimes the instrument is the problem. It depends on where a player is at with their individual journey of their skill and gear. Like I mentioned in my above post - I got to a point in jazz school where my german warwick (which you'd say is a decently solid instrument) was holding me back, so I upgraded.

I have had students who ask me about if they should upgrade their bass, and I will swap instruments with them for the lesson. I'll still be sounding better! But that's just a young student being impatient. Doesn't mean it's never the time for an instrument upgrade to = a sound upgrade (I will also add, increased playability translates to a better sound as the technique of the player is less inhibited)



That's just a perception thing. It's gearlust pure and simple. And I know gearlust, trust me. I battle with it every day. But you will never beat materialism and GAS unless you realize that's what it is. How many people for centuries thought their violin sound was being held back, and if only they got their hands on a stradivarius, they'd be complete. I am sure some actually were able to get one, felt complete for a short time, then went on to other things, maybe even looking for a more expensive instrument. It's just human nature to want and acquire things, and through choice-supportive bias we justify the gluttony by telling ourselves we need it, often prodded by marketing.

We always want "upgrades", it never ends. But IMO you have to block the shiny objects out, and concentrate on what really matters.

BTW, I had a german Warwick, and played the chinese version. Again, in blind tests, no one would be able to tell.
 

Latest posts