• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

18" - why no love?

:wacky: i totally cant read "xmax" w/o always thinking of:

NMuOqIl.png
this rare pedal can do xmas:
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
:laugh::bassist:
 
  • Like
Reactions: elkkid2
I have owned a Sunn 118-vh folded horn, which I bought used in 1979.

Although it is heavy, It never failed me and has stronger highs than most and soooo much depth. It handled high d# on G string and gut wrenching depth on E String as well.

I continue to have much love for 18's, especially in folded horn boxes; whether W-horn or other variants.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mindwell
Huh? He just says eighteens are not a good idea in high powered horn designs, that's all.

Yes, this is generally true unless the horn scales up considerably. By this time, it becomes quite impractical though. One of the challenges is to develop sufficient motor strength and diaphragm rigidity to overcome the forces of compression that result. The larger the cone the more difficult as there is a squared factor in the stiffness equations which works against getting too large.
 
I'm not super well up on cab design, but he's only talking about horns right? And simplexx cabs are bass reflex designs (???). I'm sure Bill will come and correct me if that's all terribly wrong
Sadly, Bill abandoned the forum long ago.

Simplexx cabs are bass reflex. Just like the "small, loud, low" rule for box speakers, there is a similar rule for horns, where the dimensions of the mouth determine the low frequency response of the system, more or less. I suspect that in order for a horn to provide any useful advantage over a reflex cab for an 18" driver, it would have to be gi-normous. This is a case where driver choice stems from system goals, rather than the other way around.
 
Sadly, Bill abandoned the forum long ago.

Simplexx cabs are bass reflex. Just like the "small, loud, low" rule for box speakers, there is a similar rule for horns, where the dimensions of the mouth determine the low frequency response of the system, more or less. I suspect that in order for a horn to provide any useful advantage over a reflex cab for an 18" driver, it would have to be gi-normous. This is a case where driver choice stems from system goals, rather than the other way around.

Cheers for the reply. Looks like I had the broad ideas right (I should sit down and study this stuff some day, it's fascinating). Also I didn't know Bill isn't round here anymore. That's a shame
 
Well, in general, a 118 will shove more air then a 410, in general because the majority of 18"s has a larger xmax then most 10's.
When xmax is the same it's approx the same.
Remember that you need to shove 2 times as much air(volume) to increase the spl with 3dB.

But if something is capable of moving more air but more slowly it's not all win, at least in my feeble reasoning. I don't have much experience with 18" cabs but what it it did tell me was that they noticeably didn't respond quick enough, so it didn't matter how loud or good they sounded.


I want two of them Carvin 18s, run em at two ohms, sludge band. All about that look.

Not playing sludge anymore is the problem

I hear ya. I miss the days where you had certain gear so you found a band it would fit with, not the reverse like today.
 
But if something is capable of moving more air but more slowly it's not all win, at least in my feeble reasoning. I don't have much experience with 18" cabs but what it it did tell me was that they noticeably didn't respond quick enough, so it didn't matter how loud or good they sounded.

I dont think you understand how sound works. 40hz is the same speed regardless of what size driver produces it. Same with 100hz, and 1000hz. By definition they are the same speed.