This reminds me of a company I do a ton of business with for my hobby (I'm an avid recreational road cyclist). The Topeak company makes a frame mounted pump that I like a lot...except that it keeps breaking, alarmingly frequently. Topeak's customer service is exemplary: I call them up, they send me a new replacement pump at no charge, no questions asked
...and then that pump breaks.
Lather Rinse Repeat
I think I have paid for a total of three new pumps over the years (bought to keep on three different bicycles) but I have "owned" more than a dozen due to all the generous in- or out-of-warranty replacements they've sent me. So while I love their customer service, it does start to become a bit of a nuisance when you think about the limited lifespan of the product.
It makes me wonder: If a company's service model is based around replacing shoddy products with equally shoddy products (rather than building a robust product in the first place) how many more customers do they need who never have a problem and never require replacements for it to be a profitable business?
To be profitable they're going to be forced to improve the product, or sell enough high-margin/ higher volume products to cover the warranty reserves.
Gator made changes to the design, but appeared to sacrifice strength for comfort. They really need to look at how Mono is riveting straps to the case, and their strap design.