TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Good luck, they are worth every pennyIf anyone's got a Chromatron they want to sell at $350, my PMs are open.
I second thatIf anyone's got a Chromatron they want to sell at $350, my PMs are open.
I've been on the hunt for a Doom 2 for some time. I'm not willing to pay scalper prices and frequently miss out on the when they're in the classifieds.
I'll just keep my fingers crossed for a used one and/or another release.
Good luck, they are worth every pennyIf anyone's got a Chromatron they want to sell at $350, my PMs are open.
Mine D2's rusting too. But in a good, industrial chic wayMy Doom 2 is rusty, but the graphics and stuff have held perfectly. Not so much with my MKIII. I sent him an email, but I'm not holding my breath or stressing about it. He'll get to it when he gets to it... I'm not planning of getting rid of either one anytime soon, so I'm not in a hurry to get anything replaced.
He's gotta do what he's gotta do. Who knows, may this will cause a new pedal builder to step up to fill this void? (not implying they should copy or clone)
However, I am getting to the point where I am almost willing to pay significant amounts of money for a mint Doom 2.
So I have seen a couple posts of 3Leaf Pedals having rust, is this common?
Can someone with experience talk a little more about the similarities between the Chromatron and the most recent (V4?) Proton circuits? I read earlier in the thread that the current Proton is the same circuit as the Chromatrong but with fewer controls and no effects loop. Is that right?
I ask because I recently redid my board and no longer utilize the effects loop of my Chromatron. My main gigging band is also trending in a "no amps on stage" direction which suits me just fine, but I'd like to add a cab sim to the end of my little Pedaltrain Nano+ board for that and can't do it without making some room. If the Chromatron and current Proton do in fact sound the same (more or less) then that would be a good spot for me to start making room.
I made a post in the previous page or two that yes, this is pretty much the case. I owned both and tested them against each other, matching all the relevant controls. If you're no longer using the fx loop, then yeah, you could go "down" to the Proton and save room. I wouldn't personally do this, as I find the Chroma's features indispensable, but it's your setup.Can someone with experience talk a little more about the similarities between the Chromatron and the most recent (V4?) Proton circuits? I read earlier in the thread that the current Proton is the same circuit as the Chromatrong but with fewer controls and no effects loop. Is that right?
I ask because I recently redid my board and no longer utilize the effects loop of my Chromatron. My main gigging band is also trending in a "no amps on stage" direction which suits me just fine, but I'd like to add a cab sim to the end of my little Pedaltrain Nano+ board for that and can't do it without making some room. If the Chromatron and current Proton do in fact sound the same (more or less) then that would be a good spot for me to start making room.
Pretty sure that's just it, the trigger and sensitivity range are the same, I wonder what "peak" is compared to the chrome though, is that how far the envelope goes until decay? and if so I guess you loose your attack from the chromatron. Just remember that FX loop is more than just a loop, I recently split my signal, inputted my IE Fmeron into the input of the Chromatron, inputted my bass into the return of the FX loop and never used the send. The Fmeron is what triggered the envelope, set to a percussive mod, it sounded freaking amazing. It's like toying with a sidechain on a compressorCan someone with experience talk a little more about the similarities between the Chromatron and the most recent (V4?) Proton circuits? I read earlier in the thread that the current Proton is the same circuit as the Chromatrong but with fewer controls and no effects loop. Is that right?
I ask because I recently redid my board and no longer utilize the effects loop of my Chromatron. My main gigging band is also trending in a "no amps on stage" direction which suits me just fine, but I'd like to add a cab sim to the end of my little Pedaltrain Nano+ board for that and can't do it without making some room. If the Chromatron and current Proton do in fact sound the same (more or less) then that would be a good spot for me to start making room.
I suspect that it might be Response or Tone, but i'm not totally sure.Spencer told me they were the same circuit except one of the Proton's controls has a wider range than the Chromatron's -- but I can't remember which. So essentially, the Proton can do everything the Chromatron can, but the Chromatron can't do everything the Proton can.
Peak is a resonance control on many filters. The attack on the Proton is fixed while the Decay controls the decay time.Pretty sure that's just it, the trigger and sensitivity range are the same, I wonder what "peak" is compared to the chrome though, is that how far the envelope goes until decay? and if so I guess you loose your attack from the chromatron. Just remember that FX loop is more than just a loop, I recently split my signal, inputted my IE Fmeron into the input of the Chromatron, inputted my bass into the return of the FX loop and never used the send. The Fmeron is what triggered the envelope, set to a percussive mod, it sounded freaking amazing. It's like toying with a sidechain on a compressor