TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Thanks!Glad that you've achieved your goal.
That's what I did - identical cabs; different ohm ratings....the differences in volume may be unrelated to impedance unless comparing exactly the same cabinet designs (i.e. one 4 ohm, one 8 ohm).
Certainly true. But, whatever the reason, I love the new rig!Could be that the new cabinets are also more efficient than the older ones....

Okay...I'm having some issues...I have a shuttle 6.0 and which is 375watts at 8ohms and 600 watts at 4 ohms...
I have a GB NeoX 112 which is 300 watts at 8ohms and an Avatar Neo 212 which is 500 watts at 4ohms...
When using the 212 it still seemed like I had to push the master volume and preamp gain further than I should have— well past 3 o'clock on both and my volume on my onboard preamp was all the way up.
I have an electric jazz trio that played outside yesterday and I though i'd have plenty of head room...but I didn't...
The only other thing i can think is that I need to swap out my battery on the onboard pre...
But barring that I am just setting up my rig incorrectly?
Okay...I'm having some issues...I have a shuttle 6.0 and which is 375watts at 8ohms and 600 watts at 4 ohms...
I have a GB NeoX 112 which is 300 watts at 8ohms and an Avatar Neo 212 which is 500 watts at 4ohms...
When using the 212 it still seemed like I had to push the master volume and preamp gain further than I should have— well past 3 o'clock on both and my volume on my onboard preamp was all the way up.
I have an electric jazz trio that played outside yesterday and I though i'd have plenty of head room...but I didn't...
The only other thing i can think is that I need to swap out my battery on the onboard pre...
But barring that I am just setting up my rig incorrectly?
Wattage ratings tell you next to nothing. Unfortunately that data which is pertinent is not made available.I have a GB NeoX 112 which is 300 watts at 8ohms and an Avatar Neo 212 which is 500 watts at 4ohms...
On average it takes twice the speaker complement outdoors to get the same perceived level as indoors.I have an electric jazz trio that played outside yesterday and I though i'd have plenty of head room...but I didn't...
we were fortunate to have a wall behind us...I guess it's a little frustrating to move from 1x12 to a 2x12 and have the amp running the exact same way with not that much more volume...
I was a little surprised. What you guys are saying makes sense, but the end result still doesn't make sense to me...
Make sure you compare the output of the 112 to the 212 in the same room and situation. Again, playing outside will bring any rig to its knees. Even if the Avatar is lower SPL than the GS112, doubling the drivers and almost doubling the power should sound at least somewhat bigger than a single 112 at 8ohms. However, Avatar is a good but low cost box, and the couple I've heard have been less than impressive regarding low end extension and absolute volume.
So what exactly is SPL ( getting a clinic today(sheesh) I am amp dumb)
That is sensitivity. Efficiency is a percentage, acoustical watts output compared to electrical watts input. It averages about 2%.The efficiency of a speaker enclosure (your good old cab) is usually measured by db/1 watt @ 1 meter or (db/2.3 volts @ 1 meter).
It's not just more meaningful, it is the only valid method of comparing the sensitivity of cabs. It's also not available from any major manufacturers.Actually a FR (Frequency Response) graph is more meaningful, as it will show you the efficiency of the speaker across the spectrum; not just at a single point.
