TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yeah, I know Sandy! Dude stole my job!!Hey DW, remember Sandy Anderson? Well I will see him and his 7 string Conklin tonight!![]()
I think if Fender increase the the scale length to 35in,then it wouldn't sound like a Fender,but with that being said personaly I think the Newer type Fenders ( such as the American Deluxe,) are starting to sound like a modern bass with Fender characteristics IMO.I had an American Deluxe Active Jazz 5 that sounded pretty good, the build quality was amazing. I ended up trading it for a Lakland 55-02 because after I played the B string on a 35in scale neck, there was no going back. I'm not bashing the Fender at all, it was a great bass but you'll just have to compare a few and decide. The difference in the sound quality of the B string on the 35in scale neck was more than worth the trade. I wish Fender would produce a five string model with 35in scale, I bet it would be amazing.
If you have tried them in a music store that just sticks them on the rack without any type of setup,yeah they are going to suckThe 5-string Fenders are notoriously poor as far as their B strings are concerned.. and that's the entire point of getting a 5-string. The MIA high-end Fenders are a bit better as far as string tension and definition given the string-thru-body setup, but the MIM 5-strings have no notes on the B string, just a muddy thumping sound. The definition on the B is terrible. The rest of the strings sound great, but the B is really floppy and unresponsive. Don't get a Fender 5.
If you have tried them in a music store that just sticks them on the rack without any type of setup,yeah they are going to suck
I think it's all in the touch, sorta like how some people sound good with the thump and pop stuff and some sound aweful regardless of what bass they are using. setup and strings have a lot to do with this also. Everything successful starts out with a successful approach! Hey DW, remember Sandy Anderson? Well I will see him and his 7 string Conklin tonight!![]()
This is true. I think what causes some of the bad music store impressions of Fenders is poor setup. Simply put, Fender just doesn't put the same amount of time into setting up their basses as Lakland, or Valenti, or Sadowsky. It's obnixious, but understandable from a company that sells thousands of basses per year. I find a good 15 minute setup cures those issues.

Common sense tells me that Fender can't offer their basses with a setup that I'll really prefer... too many people would play that bass and complain of flop.
![]()
+100Since June, I have owned a total of 5 Fender Deluxe 5-strings. I still have two in the stable. Every single one of them has been a top quality bass, with a smooth neck and responsive B-string. No floppyness, no mud. Bear in mind, I also own one of the touted Valentis, and the Fenders are it's equal in terms of tone and playability. Also bear in mind, I have also owned (and sold) a Lakland JO5, so I have tried what many consider the "holy grail" of B strings. Again the Fender was it's equal (although Lakland gets kudos for fantastic marketing)
Many people complain about the poor build quality and floppy B strings, but I just don't see it.
My next bass purchase? Probably a Fender Custom Classic Jazz Deluxe!!!!!!!!!
I have a '97 Am Deluxe Jazz V and have been digging it for a long time, I really like the way the pre-amp is voiced. Its a funky bass! I also have a Roscoe Beck V that does the passive J-bass thing very well.