• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

51 P vs 57 P (reissues) - Blind Test

Which sample was your favourite tone-wise?

  • Sample A

    Votes: 33 57.9%
  • Sample B

    Votes: 24 42.1%

  • Total voters
    57
By the way, I totally want a 51 style, at least as a switchable option in a multi pickup bass, one day. It's a more expressive pickup for finger playing in the lower harmonics, where as the split has a very very slightly different EQ (slightly more lowmids, slightly less upper mids) and is a more refined, more controlled pickups, than the single p 51 style. You can always hear the out of control tone on old police albums... and it's a tone I adore.

I could never leave it as my only pickup since I'm a harmonic junkie... ;-)

And this thread, OP, was done brilliantly! The samples, same levels, same playing nearly identically, I'm super impressed... and I'm not just saying this because, for once, it is a topic I actually knew about and could identify the tones of reliably ;-)
 
Sure. As most people guessed, the 51 single coil is SAMPLE B, which is a CIJ 51P with a scatter-wound "51P" flat poles Bare Knucles pickup. The single-coil P is, by standard design, on top of the node of those harmonics played (eg 4th/9th fret), so they don't translate well. You can hear they are almost mute.

The 57 split coil is SAMPLE A, which is a Classic 50s with a scatter-wound "Traditional P" by Alexander Pribora. No problems on the harmonics department.

I see that some people answered the other way around, bot most guesses were right, and I think because the "split-coil" sound is quite heard and well-understood across records and players. That familiarity might also explain the slight edge of the poll results. I do agree that differences, while played back or listened to, are not as dramatic as one might think anyway.

More thoughts and conclusions on that later...
This was a really fun thread.
I think I'm (pleasantly) surprised I am by the 51.
For some reason, I always pictured them as being very low to low-mid focused and not that bright.
However, in listening to the first clips I actually thought the 51 was brighter and even had a bit more output/volume.

Question - where would something like the Fralin 51 split-coil fit in?
Its their early 50's P-Bass pickup, but with the E and A magnets in a separate coil from the D and G (even though its one horizontal pickup.
Thanks for the fun thread.
 
I could never leave it as my only pickup since I'm a harmonic junkie... ;-)

I think Leo tried to address (and succeeded) some of the issues related to his first design. Obviously, you take and you give, but in terms of harmonics "fixed"=check, hum=check, smoother attack and larger magnetic window=check... The issue of magnetic void at the half between the two split coils of a split p in a single coil shape was brought forward before. However, due to the small magnetic window of the single pole pieces under the strings, you'll see that bendings on higher frets tend to drop in volume under each string anyway. Not that much with a Duncan single-coil quarter pounder, which I have too as a spare and it's not bad at all - I can't comment on the split QP as I've never owned one, and I don't want to touch that subject... :cautious:

This was a really fun thread.
I think I'm (pleasantly) surprised I am by the 51.
For some reason, I always pictured them as being very low to low-mid focused and not that bright.
However, in listening to the first clips I actually thought the 51 was brighter and even had a bit more output/volume.

You know what's funny? It's that I do agree that the single coil sounds brighter (I'd say "airy") and less thick when listened back, but when playing those very two basses - which are both fine - I notice a clankier presence in the upper mid register which makes me think of it as "brighter". The 51, probably also thanks to it's pickup placement, has a "bouncier" feel when you dig in and airier but smoother high frequencies. @bassdude51 , you seem to know the 51-style P inside out, can you confirm my feeling or is it just a personal thing of mine?

It might also be (to an extent) that the Bare Knuckle is claimed to be plain enamel (there's the waxed rope around the coil like in the original ones from the 50s, I can't see it) while the Pribora is enamelled copper (more orange-ish) like you see in Fralins, Aguilar, etc., with a thicker wire, which should lead it to have a slightly brighter resonant peak vs. the same design in plain enamel. However, I think both pickups are quite well voiced (I'm glad someone confirmed here) and they complement each other. And I have to add that the Knuckle is a bit thicker and warmer than the stock 51 MIJ alnico single-coil pickup, anyway, as a direct comparison. The single-coil quarter pounder is predictably rounder, fatter but also rather present on the high, with a nice modern and slightly more scooped tone. The Knuckle is smoother and more old-school by design, and definitely the more expensive of the three :)

I guess the wire would only be one of the factors anyway, and probably a rather minor one.

(OFF TOPIC: can anyone enlighten me on the wire specs of SPB3s, the "standard" quarter pounders? Is it formwar/orange or the dark purple plain enamel? All photos around the internet seem to have the plastic covers on...)

What was pointed out before and, alas, it's correct, is that the 51 has newer strings. I thought they were more similar in terms of wear than I realised here. OTOH, they are both coated Elixir Nanowebs of the same gauge, so they tend to age slowly, and I think this comparison is anyway more indicative than, say, two fresh sets of Elixir and Swing66 respectively... And I'm still within rounds, making a comparison with rounds and flats would be a bit moot IMO.

Question - where would something like the Fralin 51 split-coil fit in?
Its their early 50's P-Bass pickup, but with the E and A magnets in a separate coil from the D and G (even though its one horizontal pickup.
Thanks for the fun thread.

I can't help that much, there are more experienced users here for that, but I think you get a bit of both: a thicker response of the two coils with a lower resonant peak THAN a single coil, obviously no hum, the sharper attack of the single magnet under the string and a less mid-centered response compared to the short and large standard split bobbins - it still retains the "tall and narrow" design.

In terms of outward appearance................Slab Bodies RULE!

In terms of inward annoyance, I have to say they are a pain in the arse when playing seated, unfortunately. That's also one of the main reasons I mainly end up picking the "standard" P when playing.
 
Last edited:
The cats out of the bag, but as an owner of both styles of basses I could tell the difference. The aftermarket pickup swaps lessen the differences between them imo.
My two, in my avatar, are totally stock. The typical adage about the split coil being a thicker,heavier tone and the single coil being brighter and more articulate holds true in my experience.
As someone said, having them both in a band situation would be tricky to tell.
To actually play the two of them I can certainly tell the difference in the immediacy of the notes due to the different magnet configurations. Having the magnet directly under the string instead of straddling it was definitely an eye opener for me when I got the Squier.
 
Okay, I'll play. Can't listen to the harmonics files. I'm walking the dog and won't have good reception for a while, but I wanted to take a stab.

I think A is the 51 and B is the 57. I like the 57 just a little more, I just thought it had more depth and fullness. I thought the highs were a little more subdued on B.

I liked them both. A had more of a piano tone, which I seek for some stuff I do. A was brighter in my opinion. I might have missed if you said which one had the newer strings, but if they were on A, that could account for some difference.

Nice job, fun exercise.
 
Would you mind expanding on this? I’m not sure I understand.

When you bend a string close to the 12th fret (halfway scale-wise) you pull it sideways, if you see it from above. So you basically pull it father away from the narrow magnet sitting below -> reduction in volume and presence.

I can play a couple of samples on that tomorrow, to better illustrate the difference between the two instruments.

I think A is the 51 and B is the 57. I like the 57 just a little more, I just thought it had more depth and fullness. I thought the highs were a little more subdued on B.
A = 57
B = 51
 
Last edited:
When you bend a string close to the 12th fret (halfway scale-wise) you pull it sideways, if you see it from above. So you basically pull it father away from the narrow magnet sitting below -> reduction in volume and presence.

I can play a couple of samples on that tomorrow, to better illustrate the difference between the two instruments.


A = 57
B = 51
Cool , thanks for doing that.
I have this Maruszczyk en route to me (which is why I’m asking so many questions).

F88746B5-95B6-4F08-BCDB-638A23CEADF9.jpeg
 
When you bend a string close to the 12th fret (halfway scale-wise) you pull it sideways, if you see it from above. So you basically pull it father away from the narrow magnet sitting below -> reduction in volume and presence.

I can play a couple of samples on that tomorrow, to better illustrate the difference between the two instruments.


A = 57
B = 51


Which one had the newer strings by the way?
 
When you bend a string close to the 12th fret (halfway scale-wise) you pull it sideways, if you see it from above. So you basically pull it father away from the narrow magnet sitting below -> reduction in volume and presence.

I can play a couple of samples on that tomorrow, to better illustrate the difference between the two instruments.


A = 57
B = 51
When I checked out some of the cats that were going the other way, I figured I was toast!
 
Cool , thanks for doing that.
I have this Maruszczyk en route to me (which is why I’m asking so many questions).

Looks cool! Very similar to my CIJ 51 - the one you all heard in sample B. Do you know what pickup will it have?

The slab looks a bit less "arrogant" though, a bit like the modern approach of the CV 50s... is it slab-bodied in fact? I guess you'll probably enjoy playing it sitting down more than I do.

IMG_20200512_111744.jpg
IMG_20200512_112251.jpg


I like the way they matched the see-through ash grain of the three pieces in mine. I don't know if good attention to details is a constant factor in Fender Japanese builds...
 
When you bend a string
Looks cool! Very similar to my CIJ 51 - the one you all heard in sample B. Do you know what pickup will it have?

The slab looks a bit less "arrogant" though, a bit like the modern approach of the CV 50s... is it slab-bodied in fact? I guess you'll probably enjoy playing it sitting down more than I do.

View attachment 3825925 View attachment 3825924

I like the way they matched the see-through ash grain of the three pieces in mine. I don't know if good attention to details is a constant factor in Fender Japanese builds...

MIJ and CIJ Fenders are almost always top-notch in terms of build quality.
I've had a few over the years and they've always been great players.
My Maruszczyk has the Fralin 51 split-coil pickup (hence some of my earlier questions).
Also, it does have the belly and forearm carves (like the 54 - 56 version).
Its now in Memphis and is supposed to be delivered tomorrow.
I have a 2017 American Pro P-Bass (with tort and flats of course) so it will be interesting to compare and contrast the two.

AmPro.jpg
 
I have a 2017 American Pro P-Bass (with tort and flats of course) so it will be interesting to compare and contrast the two.

Those Am Pro look very nice and I remember I liked the neck shape and feel when I quickly tried one in a shop. I read mixed reviews about the V-Mod pickups, but it's also down to personal taste and it's a quick fix, in case.

Nice touch on the guard and cream covers, if you want to go for that vibe, it definitely complements the finish.

I have to say I really like my 2007 Classic 50s MIM anyway, and I think it's very well built and has a wonderful neck too. I had the chance to buy it second-hand from a very honest seller back in 2009, just before Fender (and subsequently private sellers) realised they could quite dramatically hike the price given their popularity
 
Last edited:
Curious how much different the front j pickup sound from the single coil P... we need a bind comparison! I enjoyed this.
I’m in a position to be able to do this comparison as well. I presumed that there would be no real discernible sonic difference because they’re both single coils in a similar position. The reality was different than I expected. I surprisingly much preferred the scpb pickup over the neck J pup alone . It just seemed to have more girth,tone and muscle imo.
What would be really cool, and a few here have done this, is to have a scpb pup in both Jazz positions with reverse winding/ polarity a la Jazz practice.
 
Curious how much different the front j pickup sound from the single coil P... we need a bind comparison! I enjoyed this.
I just redid my comparison and think I found the answer to my above post. On my Squier scpb the pickup is approximately 3/4” closer to the headstock when measured from the bridge witness points. I think this has a big effect on the resulting tone. Funny thing is I think the single Jazz pup was actually muddier than the scpb. Different aftermarket pups could likely change things around a bit. The scpb pup appears to have about 1/16” wider coil (or more windings). Not the width across the strings, the other “width”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroovyBaby

Latest posts