• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

54 Precision Attic Find

I think most people like the looks of a beat up bass. I believe the question is often whether it's through a relicing process or honest wear.
what's better...a bass that's "artificially aged" or a bass that's very obviously re-finished? What if the body looks brand-new but the neck and headstock look 60 years old? Which will affect the value more given the fact that it's so old and rare? Does it even really matter as long as it plays and sounds good?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fender_Bender
Wow!! This is a very interesting thread! What a great find and nice way to a restored slab body!
My thoughts on the finish: by now it would be Butterscotch after so many years. I would choose that so it will be recognized as a vintage bass.

Here's my newly finished 51RI:

View attachment 2843206
Right here. This is perfect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arrow
what's better...a bass that's "artificially aged" or a bass that's very obviously re-finished? What if the body looks brand-new but the neck and headstock look 60 years old? Which will affect the value more given the fact that it's so old and rare? Does it even really matter as long as it plays and sounds good?
Yeah, sort of like being a little pregnant. Probably the best that can be done is to finish it in nitro lacquer, knowing that it’s going to age much faster than a modern finish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bthebassplayer
what's better...a bass that's "artificially aged" or a bass that's very obviously re-finished? What if the body looks brand-new but the neck and headstock look 60 years old? Which will affect the value more given the fact that it's so old and rare? Does it even really matter as long as it plays and sounds good?

I bought a very beat up 63 P bass and had it refined and didn't get it reliced. There are parts of the bass that are worn looking and yet the finish is new. You can see through the clear parts in the lacquer that gouges and dings in the wood remain where the former player dug his fingernail into the area above the pick guard. I don't think it looks incongruent. If anything it tells the story of the instrument. By relicing an instrument you mask the temporal journey of the instrument, its different owners, eras etc. You accelerate it to a pre-determined state of being that is completely out of touch with its actual lived experience. To me that is uninteresting. My bass is old with a new finish because I bought an old worn bass and put a new finish on it, period. It's a unique look. Relicing that new finish would simply make it look pastiche and deny the instrument the opportunity to tell its story in the years unfolding. Hope I'm not getting too philosophical here :)
 
I bought a very beat up 63 P bass and had it refined and didn't get it reliced. There are parts of the bass that are worn looking and yet the finish is new. You can see through the clear parts in the lacquer that gouges and dings in the wood remain where the former player dug his fingernail into the area above the pick guard. I don't think it looks incongruent. If anything it tells the story of the instrument. By relicing an instrument you mask the temporal journey of the instrument, its different owners, eras etc. You accelerate it to a pre-determined state of being that is completely out of touch with its actual lived experience. To me that is uninteresting. My bass is old with a new finish because I bought an old worn bass and put a new finish on it, period. It's a unique look. Relicing that new finish would simply make it look pastiche and deny the instrument the opportunity to tell its story in the years unfolding. Hope I'm not getting too philosophical here :)

Well, then why paint it at all? That aside, go ahead and post a pic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AltGrendel
IMG_0484.JPG Here's my un-refinished, naturally worn 1962 (slab board). There's no way I'dre-finish it. However, if it was poorly re-finished, I would have MJT finish it and give it a mildly worn look. This is perfectly acceptable these days since 'relic' is actually a type of finish.
 
View attachment 2845112 Here's my un-refinished, naturally worn 1962 (slab board). There's no way I'dre-finish it. However, if it was poorly re-finished, I would have MJT finish it and give it a mildly worn look. This is perfectly acceptable these days since 'relic' is actually a type of finish.
That's what my '62 slab board P-bass would look like if it wasn't painted by the previous owner's drummer in 1968.... with house paint nonetheless. But I got it for the price I did because of it, so I can't complain.
There's a deep groove above the pickguard, the last two frets are flat (had a partial refret in the 70's), and the tone and volume knob have a groove nearly an 1/8th deep from heavy use.
I might get it refinished in black nitro, just so it's not crappy paint
IMG_9376.JPG IMG_9378.JPG
 
Filling,drying ,sanding,filling,drying,sanding,filling,drying,sanding........In a few more days I'll know if this is the end of the filling process..Just needed a temporary prop up to document a mark on the time line. Finish wet sanded with 600 paper. No color yet...
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2536.JPG
    IMG_2536.JPG
    1.1 MB · Views: 67
  • IMG_2537.JPG
    IMG_2537.JPG
    1.3 MB · Views: 70
  • IMG_2538.JPG
    IMG_2538.JPG
    1.4 MB · Views: 63
  • IMG_2539.JPG
    IMG_2539.JPG
    1.5 MB · Views: 57
  • IMG_2540.JPG
    IMG_2540.JPG
    1.3 MB · Views: 56
  • IMG_2543.JPG
    IMG_2543.JPG
    635.4 KB · Views: 65
  • IMG_2544.JPG
    IMG_2544.JPG
    1.1 MB · Views: 58
  • IMG_2542.JPG
    IMG_2542.JPG
    1.1 MB · Views: 54
  • IMG_2546.JPG
    IMG_2546.JPG
    834 KB · Views: 59