TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yuck. I would not touch it with. 10 foot pole. I would spend less on a new one that is better on every way. But I really dislike vintage so my dislike is probably an indication that the bass is just the sort of thing a vintage buff would love.
I thought about that this afternoon, Bassist30. That's old(er) grown wood, which cannot be found today. There is value in that, but...how much, I can't tell you.
... The wood is old and to tell you the truth I don't find it looking bad. I like a bass with tons of mojo. But you can find a 73 easier than a 63. Keep in mind older does not guarantee a great sounding bass...
To the EU people - why not have the shipper declare a value for customs of $500? Unless the customs agent is a collector, how would he know otherwise? That way your VAT would be $120. Better yet, why not have the shipper send the body and neck in 2 different packages? Declare the value at $100 each?
To the EU people - why not have the shipper declare a value for customs of $500? Unless the customs agent is a collector, how would he know otherwise? That way your VAT would be $120. Better yet, why not have the shipper send the body and neck in 2 different packages? Declare the value at $100 each?
Then if one of the packages is lost, you can try to get reimbursed for declared value of...$100?
As mentioned above, that is probably just not the case in the OP's market.No! With all that mentioned, it is way too expensive. $1300 maybe...?