My '72 has never been my favorite bass, but that's probably not the bass's fault.
I started out playing short scale, so the Jazz felt awkward in the beginning, plus I was never big on slap.
Then the drummer let me play his Travis Bean which sounded way better while adjusting to long scale.
Later I put Fralins in and finally fell in love with the sound.
Weight has never been an issue because it is what it is, and I believe this concern is more contemporary,
I don't recall bassist complaining about that back in the day.
It's extremely possible that the '73 sounds better with EMG's than stock, unless stock is a must for you,
I wouldn't worry about that. But I'd be concerned about the overall wear, especially the binding, plus,
I'm not really a Badass fan.
I personally think it's overpriced. I talked to my luthier about rebinding a project bass,
and he said, "patching binding is cheap, but a complete rebind will cost you".
I agree with johnson79, it may be worth $1500, if that much.
057912
I started out playing short scale, so the Jazz felt awkward in the beginning, plus I was never big on slap.
Then the drummer let me play his Travis Bean which sounded way better while adjusting to long scale.
Later I put Fralins in and finally fell in love with the sound.
Weight has never been an issue because it is what it is, and I believe this concern is more contemporary,
I don't recall bassist complaining about that back in the day.
It's extremely possible that the '73 sounds better with EMG's than stock, unless stock is a must for you,
I wouldn't worry about that. But I'd be concerned about the overall wear, especially the binding, plus,
I'm not really a Badass fan.
I personally think it's overpriced. I talked to my luthier about rebinding a project bass,
and he said, "patching binding is cheap, but a complete rebind will cost you".
I agree with johnson79, it may be worth $1500, if that much.
057912