• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

70s jazz bass - what do you think?

My '72 has never been my favorite bass, but that's probably not the bass's fault.
I started out playing short scale, so the Jazz felt awkward in the beginning, plus I was never big on slap.
Then the drummer let me play his Travis Bean which sounded way better while adjusting to long scale.

Later I put Fralins in and finally fell in love with the sound.
Weight has never been an issue because it is what it is, and I believe this concern is more contemporary,
I don't recall bassist complaining about that back in the day.

It's extremely possible that the '73 sounds better with EMG's than stock, unless stock is a must for you,
I wouldn't worry about that. But I'd be concerned about the overall wear, especially the binding, plus,
I'm not really a Badass fan.

I personally think it's overpriced. I talked to my luthier about rebinding a project bass,
and he said, "patching binding is cheap, but a complete rebind will cost you".
I agree with johnson79, it may be worth $1500, if that much.

Long_Scale_Family.JPG

057912
 
  • Like
Reactions: thanos k
For what's supposed to be a 70's vintage Jazz the pickup spacing looks like a 60's vintage to me. Hmmmm????

I have to agree - I know these are EMG pickups in there, but if you were to measure (pole-to-pole, if pole pieces existed in this case) between these pickups, it should be 4 inches.

That should put the bridge pickup parallel to the Tone knob...

These look like 60's spacing to me.

Wondering if this is not a 70's neck on a 60's body?

Still a cool instrument nonetheless, I'm diggin' it! :thumbsup:
 
  • Like
Reactions: thanos k
I have to agree - I know these are EMG pickups in there, but if you were to measure (pole-to-pole, if pole pieces existed in this case) between these pickups, it should be 4 inches.

That should put the bridge pickup parallel to the Tone knob...

These look like 60's spacing to me.

Wondering if this is not a 70's neck on a 60's body?

Still a cool instrument nonetheless, I'm diggin' it! :thumbsup:

Its a 70's body - the gap between the bridge pickup and the pickguard is big.
 
Neck looks great as does headstock since you've cleaned it. I'd just bin the ugly pickguard and one day a pair of 70's Jazz bass pickups will surface on ebay. Hell, if you buy the bass, contact me, I've got a 1980 Fender J Bass bridge pickup that needs a new home. You can have it cheap!
 
  • Like
Reactions: thanos k
Crazy overpriced. Not only is that bass not original, but it needs work. Expensive work. $2,300US for that!? No way. Consider this - I sold a '78 Jazz on ebay a couple months ago. It was all original, except for a rewound neck pickup. I got $1550 for it, and it took a long time to sell.

If you have $2,300 to spend, you have a staggering choice of fantastic basses to choose from. And they'll all be a million times better than that beat up boat oar you're looking at.
 
The stuff CBS put out there in this time frame are crap...it's nuts to believe the price people want for vintage crap. If you want something that's old, totally get it. I wouldn't buy a 67-70's Fender instruments even if I could afford them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thanos k
a fellow musician is selling his 1973? (probably) jazz bass. his is not the first owner. i'm considering a buy, but would like your opinion as well since i'm not an expert in vintage instruments (even though i know that this era of basses is not the super valuable vintage case scenario)

i got it home last night and played it for a while... my thoughts

1) plays great
2) frets in very good condition (no buzz) from top to bottom
3) a lot of wear and tear (A LOT)
4) binding in bad condition
5) nice fat neck but the finish is long gone and has a lot of grey spots from dirt
6) super heavy - a boat anchor
7) i think that somebody tried to paint the headstock to match the body colour with bad results
8) missing the original pickups (it has emgs)
9)missing the original bridge (it has a badass)
10) missing the original hard case
11) it needs a set up and new strings to really shine
12) i think that the pickguard is not original as well (badly cut and missing a few holes for thumprest etc) he sells it at 2.290 usd (2000 euros)

the sound is typical 70's jazz - slap sound was as i expected much better than my am. std 2008 jazz bass, but the overall playability of my 2008 is better ( of course it's a lot lighter and user friendly and it has a more than decent sound that i can live with)

if you were in my shoes would you consider a purchase ??? would you consider a mild restoration or would keep it as it is (i'm thinking about re-binding and a pickup swap with fender pickups, and try to remove that mess on the headstock)???

thanks in advance View attachment 3276816View attachment 3276815View attachment 3276814

I am not a fan of 70s Fenders … for less money you can get a newer bass in better shape
 
  • Like
Reactions: thanos k

Latest posts