• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

97 american deluxe jazz

has single pole jazz pickups. im told they are by Suhr? anything extra super duper special about them?
The pre is also designed by Suhr making it sound different than the newer dlx MIA jazzes. from what iv'e read the 97's have a regular size headstock which gives the bass "neckdive", this was corrected in 98 with a smaller headstock. Also 97 dlx basses had "capped" bodies on their translucent finishes, if you look at dlx basses made on or before 97 you will notice they have a solid color border around the edge of the bass to hide the capped border. 98 dlx basses did away with this!
 
Also 97 dlx basses had "capped" bodies on their translucent finishes, if you look at dlx basses made on or before 97 you will notice they have a solid color border around the edge of the bass to hide the capped border. 98 dlx basses did away with this!

From what I've read about the development process of the "new" Fender Basses introduced in 1995, the Ash/Alder/Ash "caps" wasn't any type of trick or method to deceive the customer, as it was mentioned in the reviews at the time as well as the spec sheets. I think Fender was attempting to a) be able to give a nice grain to their basses, even the ones that were Alder-based, and b) mix the best of Ash and Alder tonally. I do know that those colors were picked for use before the prototyping and woos selection was over, and that they simply were a favorite of the designers and Fender artists who helped in the prototyping process.

A friend of mine was one of the artists who "sat in" on the process and helped Fender with his opinion of what worked on the "new" basses and what didn't - I'll drop him an e-mail and see if he can add anything.
 
From what I've read about the development process of the "new" Fender Basses introduced in 1995, the Ash/Alder/Ash "caps" wasn't any type of trick or method to deceive the customer, as it was mentioned in the reviews at the time as well as the spec sheets. I think Fender was attempting to a) be able to give a nice grain to their basses, even the ones that were Alder-based, and b) mix the best of Ash and Alder tonally. I do know that those colors were picked for use before the prototyping and woos selection was over, and that they simply were a favorite of the designers and Fender artists who helped in the prototyping process.

A friend of mine was one of the artists who "sat in" on the process and helped Fender with his opinion of what worked on the "new" basses and what didn't - I'll drop him an e-mail and see if he can add anything.

I never said that I thought that capped basses was a bad thing but just that was what they did at that time. The op asked for info on that particular bass and I gave him some! good, bad or indifferent. Heck I own a FMT V that's alder, rosewood with a maple top as well as a CS SB FMT custom classic jazz so the 95-97 jazz is not the only bass Fender put a cap on!
 
During that early period (pre 98), they also had white dots instead of pearloid. Five strings version came with in line Gotoh tuners.

Ash capped basses were a standard feature back then and they also offered some colors not available today.

I personally prefer Suhr electronics. After 1998 Fender changed them to their proprietary 18V preamp and didn`t improve the sound.

Nothing wrong with the Noiseless / SCN pickups, but the preamp is the weak point of those basses, of course IMHO.
 
I never said that I thought that capped basses was a bad thing but just that was what they did at that time.

Well, you did say that the finish was made to go solid at the edge of the body and "hiding" any view of the multiple woods, somewhat implying that the Ash/Alder/Ash was something Fender was something to hide. Perhaps I was reading a bit too deeply into your post, so my apologizes. *All* of my main players have tops to their bodies (Flamed Maple on Ash on my Mike Lulls, Flamed Maple/Zebrawood on Alder on my Spectors) so I'm in the same boat as well, and I actually prefer the cruise that way: I find 2-3 different woods chosen carefully can compliment each other and the strength in one support a weakness in the other, and vice versa. :D

fory, from playing a friend's '96/'97 I'm in agreement that the Suhr pickups and preamp was the best in Fender's production line of basses. IMO the Noiseless pups were a significant downturn, and it wasn't until the combination of the SCN pups along with the 18V preamp that they had a pickup/preamp combination that didn't automatically need aftermarket :help: .
 

Latest posts