TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
No_Germs said:really? IMO jazz bass is far away from a rickenbacker... it has a much more trebelish sounds... or am i completley wrong?
19870929 said:I own a 1978 Rickenbacker 4003. I also own 8 Warwick Basses. The only reason I have the rickenbacker is to be able to play the old Rush stuff, my Warwicks are BY FAR the best sounding instruments I have found for my taste, but the Rick is for different purposes, is an instrument with a Nasty sound, but that is what Im looking for.
i stand correctedFaithNoMan said:They didn't make a 4003 in '78...not that I know of!?!?![]()
i must admit im a huge fan. Really like the rick sound too, but for different purposes.Tbirdbassist said:The 4003 didn't appear until the 80's. I beleive the 4001 was discontinued as the "standard"in 1982 or 83. But it feeps reappearing in special editions and what not so I guess it technically hasn't been completly pulled from the line.
I've been questioning 19870929's creds lately. Every post I've seen of his has been praising towards Warwick. Just seems a little fishy to me...
lug said:Ric:
Link Removed
Peavey T-40 (in single coil mode on both pups)
Link Removed
FaithNoMan said:The 2nd one sounds good, but is more of a J bass tone...it's missing the upper end "chime" of the Ric..![]()
You can't hear the difference? Or is that just an approximation of a Ric sound?
It still sounds good, and makes me gas for a T-40 ....they are a nice dark contrast to my Ric...now that I have heard one...thanks!