Hello,
one of the hardest things to do when moving from a playing exclusively in bands to experimenting with solo/experimental playing is to separate out the
instrument from the
function. The functional bass component in a particular piece/band/genre/idiom is something that can be filled by all kinds of different instruments - anything capable of the frequency/tone/combination of notes and rhythms required.
And most of technical practice and focus - if we grow up playing in bands - is around filling that roll on the bass guitar. But it's not a roll that is specific to the instrument, neither is it necessarily what any particular bass guitar is best adapted for.
So, in mentally extracting the range of sounds, techniques, ways of processing and contextualising the bass guitar from that perception of its role, we can start to mess with what's possible given its specific set of physical characteristics.
And we discover that bass is a quite distinct and beautiful chordal instrument, that melodies on the bass can work beautifully, that a lot of techniques thought of as normal guitar techniques actually transfer nicely over to bass but give somewhat different results given the scale length and string guage, that the sound of a bass can really lend itself to be processed and layered (hence my own focus on looping and layering bass sounds - the instrument seems to be crying out for it).
it's a bit of a struggle to get our heads round that, but once we do, we can then harness that understanding of the physical possibilities of the instrument to whatever music inspires us, regardless of instrument. And thus take our cues from singers, piano players, orchestras, bands, harpists, guitarists, whoever... and seek to make beautiful music that soundtracks the world, rather than clever **** that impresses other bass players
Steve
www.stevelawson.net