Acoustic vs GK

[jimmy9]

Is the acoustic b200h a good amp? Or is the GK bp600 better? How do they compare? And witch one should buy. Please help

 

[B-string]

Yes. In some ways. GK more power and a little more flexable. The one that sounds better to you.
You heard this before I'm sure, but your ears will have to be the judge.

 

[heavyhitter]

They are both decent for the $$. There have been alot of post like this one and even a couple polls. GK usually wins by a 2to1 vote over the Acoustic.

 

[Chuck King]

They sound different. It really comes down to what kind of tone you prefer. Those polls suggest that GK tone is more popular, but that doesn't mean it is what YOU are looking for. You really need to listen to them both to decide.

 

[luis781]

I would pick the Acoustic B200H over the backline head just because I don't like the backline heads, If it were like the 700rb I would definitely pick GK. To me the acoustic is bang for your buck plus its pretty loud for just being 200w.

 

[xgator4u]

GK , that is nuff said

 

[user362432]

B600H would put GK in the corner. Played both. I didn't like GK at all.

 

[J. Crawford]

I love my GK MB2-500.

But thats a whole different line. I really enjoyed the Acoustic stuff I played.

 

[B-string]

B600H would put GK in the corner. Played both. I didn't like GK at all.

Question was the B200H, not the 600?
Some people don't like GK, most do!