• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Active vs. Inactive

My active bass's sound is not noticeably less consistent than my passive bass's sound.

Would it change if the battery ran down? Yes, of course. Do I let the battery get that run down? No I don't. But changing it twice a year is more than sufficient so it's not much of a burden.

Does it add weight though? To put a preamp in you have to take some of the wood out, maybe the weight evens out by the time you allow extra space for wiring.

You have just given me another reason to prefer basses without pickguards though, the weight saving.
glad to be of service
 
I used to play active basses then realised I preferred the tone with the active bass in passive mode (more growly, open and less compressed). Also less to fiddle with. So I started using passive basses. Then I got a passive bass with active EMG JVX pickups. It’s definitely my favourite. Nice and growly with more punch. The best bass I have for slap and as good as the passives for finger style. All the goodness of single coils but with zero hum.
 
Last edited:
The two basses I own have active EMG pickups. I love my sound from them. When my band plays songs that require a tune-down, I play my guitar player's Squier. This is a one pickup, passive bass. I know I am not playing the best instrument in the world there, but the sound is much quieter. I have to turn my amp up just to get it back to where my active basses were.

I am considering getting another bass to replace that Squier and am inclined to go active again. Is there any reason why I should consider an inactive bass? Or more to the point, is there a reason I shouldn't rule inactive basses out?
This one's passive and very versatile.

As for passive and potent...
20200319-000712.jpg
 
Last edited: