Worth mentioning, if you can get your input at a balanced mic level your K12 will sound much better.
funny you mention that.
there's a GT-100 thread discussing just that.
i agree. but sacrifices shall be made to get my schlock heard!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Worth mentioning, if you can get your input at a balanced mic level your K12 will sound much better.
Yesterday while recording I noticed my keyboardist was using a Radial J+4 balanced signal driver in front of his. It made me think of your thread, anyways just thought I'd throw it out there.
There are a number of guys using Zoom B3s who've been going straight into a full range PA cab for some time. I'm quite tempted myself.
excellent suggestion. just the portability and cost make it a consideration.
the 2nd K12 would be for stereo.
thanks! gotta love TB!

This is a very cool thread, but I just have to snarkishly mention that a great ~$800 cabinet (K12 cost) without the built-in power/DSP is way more attractive to me, because I already have plenty of amplification options. I had to "settle" for a few 15/6/1 cabs and a 15sub—just cause I can, snark snark.![]()
My point, sans snark, is that I totally get the K12, and I have heard similar rigs I dig. But, if a bassist already has an amp head, the k12 is not an optimal solution. Also, since you have noticed that a single k12 is not quite enough "sometimes", I happen to know that a single 15/6/1 usually is, unless you are @BurningSkies haha! Wait, do they make an unpowered 15" version?![]()