• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Alder or Ash Body

Thanks for the input guys. I am just looking at the new jazz deluxe basses. Some of them are alder some are ash. The transparent wine finish is beautiful and ash.

I wouldn't stress about what wood the bass is made from as far as tone goes. Everything else being equal (i.e., the choice is between two new Jazz deluxes) If you really like the transparent wine finish, get that.
 
IME:
alder: a little duller than ash, but 90% of the vintage fender basses were made out of it so you can't go wrong with it.

heavy ash: brighter, a little more sustain, and weighs a ton.

swamp ash: more midrange 'pop', and more resonant than alder, and nowhere near as bright as heavy ash and the lightest weight of the three.

2 cents............
YMMV.
 
IME:
alder: a little duller than ash, but 90% of the vintage fender basses were made out of it so you can't go wrong with it.

heavy ash: brighter, a little more sustain, and weighs a ton.

swamp ash: more midrange 'pop', and more resonant than alder, and nowhere near as bright as heavy ash and the lightest weight of the three.

2 cents............
YMMV.

I am in complete agreement with the above. But tonewood variations are VERY minor and usually can only be noticed after you have "lived" with a bass for some time. Given a choice I usually pick ash because it's brighter and I like the nice look of the wood grain, but I have Alder basses too and I love their tone as well.

It's best to pick the wood used in the bass on other characteristics like weight and finish which are far more noticeable than tone.