• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Alice in Chains - Would bass tone

It happens a lot on overproduced albums, one clean full track, then a seperate track with effects, usually gives really good results. The engineer may make you play the same thing twice for a realistic double track!! our guitarist had to do the same solo perfectly twice. sounded good though. Vocals do this loads aswell plus multi effects.:bassist:
 
  • Like
Reactions: WaldoNova
You are forgetting one thing. Yes he is using an Ampeg for his live stage tone but if you look up some interviews he is also using a SansAmp Bass DI for the live sound you are hearing mixed with the mic'd cab.

I would suspect that is where you are getting that "grit" from live.

This is live anyway. Good luck trying to perfectly reproduce the studio tone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SwimP
well, after speaking with Evan of bass northwest in Seattle, who was there for the recording, here is how Would was recorded. 3 tracks of bass. 1) spector ns2 into ampeg svt 2 into 8x10 e. track 2) spector into art nightbass on rickenfaker preset tweaked a bit into board. track 3) Kramer ferrington acoustic bass into board. Mixx the 3, that's the sound.
 
Oah on the recording, there is a 4th track which was Spector direct to the board. Mike Starr did play those parts on it as well as the rest of the album.

That is awesome to hear. I almost quit playing bass my first few weeks of learning in H.S. The I saw the "Would" video on late one night in the late 90's and that lit a fire under me, and I never looked back. I always hears Mike Starr was actually very, very good on both bass and guitar. That he played what needed to be played for AIC but musically he was very talented. You probably know more about that than I would. Just what I have heard.

Do you know what settings he set his amp and bass? Sorry, to be technical but you got some really good info for us AIC/Mike Starr fans.
 
Incredible as it's a different bass player and a different bass!
That's Mr Starr's replacement Mike Inez playing a Warwick Streamer. I think it's mostly the PJ pickup sound, drop tuning played with a pick, and a pushed amp.
It's almost there, the raw tone isn't quite as gritty as the Spector IMHO.
Here it is again, for all those people who simply don't realize how good an acoustic bass can sound.
Not to mention some of the older videos don't work.

Yeah, plugged in, just like you plug in a P bass or a Jazz or a Stingray.
 
Not that I have any *proof*, but the rumor mill has always been saying that by the recording of "Dirt" that Mike Starr was almost as smacked-out as Lanye*, and that most if not all of the bass parts were recorded by Cantrell and producer Dave Jerden.

*Starr is supposed to be included in VH1's "Celebrity Rehab 3" if this counts for anything...
Mike Starr recorded all the parts. The only song they had finished was Would? when they approached my friend for help. Then my friend wrote the bass lines for all the rest of the songs then showed Mike how to play them. All that my friend requested in return was to put in the liner notes "Thanks to ***********" - and when the album came out and it didn't mention his name at all - he got super pissed & had a falling out with him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Atshen
disclaimer: I LOVE this song, LOVE Starr and Inez, and I think AIC was the single most original, creative, and musical hard rock band of that entire era!

I think you misspelled Soundgarden :)

I loved AIC; Dirt is probably my favorite album of that era...closely behind Soundgarden's Superunknown, but as far as being the most creative, I would have to give Soundgarden the edge. Ben Shepard is also a very underrated bassist.
 

Latest posts